So the MSC will reserve the same ammunition as the AMX 40, will have a little more mobility or even the same, a little more speed but much less armor…
and will be in 10.7 while the AMX 40 is in 10?? find the error
2 Likes
Also is that tank really supposed to weight 53t?
These da_n id____s are absolutely butchering the MSC — just like what they’ve been doing to Leclerc for years.
6 Likes
Ah yes no armour but weighs the same as regular leclerc with armour. Make it make sense
6 Likes
So this is the tank they were hesitant to add for several years ? This was the time it took for them to add an objectively worse AMX 40 ? Their logic are beyond my comprehension. Not that surprised though. It was the same story with the Dunkerque…
3 Likes
Emphasis on you have played, no we have lol
It being a test bed it could have some kind of steel weights to simulate armor like the Obj292, but Gaijin seems to just keep the wight without bothering to think about where it cam from and how to implement it correctly (even if just based on assumptions)
2 Likes
even on obj292 the steel weights are modeled and have actual armor values somewhat , msc is just a empty box that is heavy.
5 Likes
That’s french light tanks for you ;-) But without scouting and drone. And light tank spawn cost. No. wait. But it does have a stabilizer no? Yes, that should be enough actually to make any france player happy.
1 Like
MSC might be a competitor to the pt16 soon?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/uakoAAOUVhKR
3 Likes