last time i remember this acc’s nick was fightclups and the owner stopped playing and changed the nickname i guess why ?
1 Like
i just left the game after this
Can’t I just start the game over again?
And ive never changed my name it was always Rarefss
This bug can happen on any tank, Leclerc is not unique here
4 Likes
i know i was joking
Unironically enjoying Leclerc AZUR’s LWS, when people Rangefind me I know where they are, its a useful tool
That being said, there’s a significant amount of work that needs to be done on the Leclerc, and I appreciate this step in the right direction
7 Likes
France player discovers what LWS is in 2025 🤣😭
France ground truly is in a desperate situation …
2 Likes
We need anything we can get because we get so little
7 Likes
That’s not fair.
We get a lot of “We can’t fix that, it would have to go up in BR and doesn’t have a line up” and “Not a bug”. 😿
Poor Vextra, man. Had to get nerfed and they refuse to buff it for a top tier light
Then to add insult to injury, add a half-dutch chassis with a belgian turret at 10.3 to Germany
7 Likes
Fuel tanks are some of the most OP things in the game (even more OP than spall liners).
They completely nullify any spalling, and only provides a chance of it exploding… but this isn’t even the case for external fuel tanks.
AMX-32 and Leopard 2K has the same annoying feature… same with LFP of T-Series MBTs, as well as the Leclerc (as you can see), Type 90, and Type 10. I could probably think of more vehicles with similar ‘survivability buff’ too.
Recently they gutted it’s gearbox. Not that it was any good to begin with, but now from a standstill it really struggles to get going.
We’re back at the point where the Type 16 is the undisputed best armoured car at 9.7 by sole virtue of not having Gaijin’s signature gearbox with 57 gears.
2 Likes
The 9.7 lineup of France is insulting. AMX-40 with the wrong thermals and missing lots of armor, Vextra without proper ammo and crappy mobility, and the Roland down to a measly 35 degrees of elevation
All of them are unrealistically nerfed, and for what? To sell some mediocre IFV and give it a very forced lineup?
9 Likes
Let’s be honest: it was honestly just German mains crying about being destroyed by the Vextra, so Gaijin nerfed it to hell to appease the Begleitpanzer and Wiesel spammers.
5 Likes
The fact that the amx-40 is more mobile than the vextra says enough
1 Like
The Leclerc fuel tanks being hit detonates the Leclerc consistently. The video you are responding to does not demonstrate a fuel tank being hit. It is hitting the side panel ERA of the Leclerc AZUR, but this also was not the cause as this behaviour was present on most tanks at that point in time if they had sufficient voids in the crew compartment, as Leclerc does.
Dear Leclerc/French players, there is no punchline, Leclerc’s hull armor is just sad. Atp I’m 99.9% positive it has only got the level of KE protection that it does just to appease ya all. With this LoS thickness, I am more than positive the British documents are currently the most accurate estimates of the tank’s protection (and as such, it should be nerfed whenever possible) - because you are not getting ~550mm RHAe out of 580mm of space, not even with 2020s composites, much less with 1990s.
12 Likes
Good thing people are taking issue with the turret armour than the hull armour.
The sky will fall before the British, or yank but yanks rarely have the capacity to put together half coherent snark, actually read what they push in to be snarky about. This is, of course, assuming your resources correct.
Right, and?
I’m talking about how the hull armor is, I have not talked about the performance of the turret (which is a more complicated matter due to how the turret is built, and protection levels are not as uniform as they are for pretty much every other MBT), i’d rather you don’t act like a smartass and goalpost this.
edit: this 3D model is from KNDS own website, btw…
