For its mobility and well… (I can only test it on trial but it is the same only in part with only 5 shells in the tank on tar in Leclerc S1).
Finally the Hyperbar seems to be present normally it accelerates from 0-32 in 5s and it does it after 4s on asphalt and perhaps the same on land (in good conditions) It brakes quite quickly and runs correctly in place.
On this video we see that the exhaust gases are not very visible (you have to look closely to realize it and make the difference between dust and smoke ha and Gaijin a video can hardly be faked… so yes the smoke in game and normally not so thick…) We see its very good braking on land and its very good mobility (in slalom passages)
Ah that beloved accurate Three-tone camouflage…
Would like to have it on my XXI and S1, currently you can obtain AUSTERLITZ camo for S2 which has accurate tone. Gotta say it looks amazing on my S2.
I made a suggestions for the CCE camo to be added to >1986 french vehicle but it has still not past the moderators
İ hope they will accept this at least so when i die in my inaccurate Leclerc my tank will look amazing :)
The French die with pride and with their heads held high.
Hypothesis n°1: Nuh uh, they speak french so this is obviously fake…
Hypothesis n°2: “Statements that are not supported by documents are not accepted as sources”
Hypothesis n°3: “Hello.The situation you describe is not a mistake, but we will consider your suggestion and possibly implement it in the future”
Edit: (the last two hypothesis are quoted from real Leclerc reported issues)
🤣.
Shall we still try to report it ?😅🤣
You can report it if you want but personally I advise you to make a suggestion instead 🙂
I’ll try both
Actually I tried it on my account and watched video of the Leclerc and concerning the smoke, it honestly don’t seem excessive, so idk
And of course on the video we see almost nothing in game if xD and it is especially the Thermal side, failing to have a good reload rate a realistic camouflage and the F2 could be slightly less detectable.
would be lovely if the Leclerc was that maneuverable in game feels like im swinging around in a challenger in game rn with how sluggish it is
Oh please. Stop trying to gaslight us by implying that it’s because we don’t report things properly that changes aren’t made.
Spookston provided you with actual declassified documents about a the M41A1 showing that a changes that was about to be implemented was wrong, only for gaijin to ignore it.
And as far as my personal experience go, I made a report stating that French heavy cruisers were missing their AP shells, quoting two different sources. The report was closed because “not enough info lol”.
They didn’t even try to ask me if I could provide more complete sources or anything, they just closed it.
And let’s not forget this video, which I also reported, where a shell that doesn’t penetrate the hull proper kills the whole crew and ignores an armored wall. Closed for not being a bug, again.
It pens the wall with the green rectangle and ignores the wall highlighted by the red rectangle
And there’s that video that I posted two days ago, where the armor failed to bounce a shot at a near 90 degrees angle.
How the hell can you expect us to think “Yep, that’s working at intended, totally not a bug!”? It’s absurd.
The community’s reports aren’t the problem here, it’s gaijin’s unwillingness to listen.
I’ll try to pass them as suggestions instead, but I have zero hope that it’ll work.
After all, gaijin seems to be more preoccupied in adding incredibly niche vehicles that no one will play on the regular like the AMX-10M when they could be adding stuff like the AMX-10RC TML, Vextra 105mm/120mm, AMX-10 RAA or AMX-13 with quad 12.7mm for the AA line, or an IFV line… You know, stuff that would actually be useful and make the tree more enticing to play.
Nobody is attempting to gaslight anyone here and there has been no claim someone has reported anything incorrectly.
Reports are reviewed based on the material submitted. If they are insufficient, they are closed. They sadly cannot be left open forever waiting for someone to hopefully provide more information. If you had more information to give, it would be generally best to submit everything when you make the report in the first place.
If you find new information after a report has been closed, you can create a new one for consideration. If you find material when one is still already open, you can PM any moderator to add it to that existing report.
I believe you misunderstood. We were not talking about suggestions here on the forum. But the matter of reports on the CBR being handled as suggested changes (as they are not directly bugs). They are two entirely different matters.
Is it possible to update the bug report site, to stat that a report is passed along as a suggestion?
My god… I just imagined the government administrations closing our current file because it is missing: A signature, a document, an RIB etc… Seriously? Players make the effort to make reports and the moderators do not make the effort to deepen the research with the players…
This is already under consideration to have a dedicated consideration tag for suggested matters.
By the way, as long as you are here, do you know how much time it takes for an suggestion on the forum to be check by the moderators?