Well I would be really interested but I don’t know what qualification is needed … I did make a 80 pages study on French vehicles and have some experience with the military but I know nothing about video games development.
3 Likes
That is wrong. We’re told that the “Italian Consultant for France” was just a rumor that is wrong. However the Consultant doesn’t want to interact or work with the community in any way. We tried really. The only way now is to give feedback on the forum for Gaijin to look at and investigate the situation.
1 Like
Well, sir.
If you’re a fellow Leclerc enjoyer with some qualifications, might as well throw your hat in with an email to the appropriate channel.
You might incorrectly think of some of us Leclerc supporters as trolls, but I support you at least attempting to apply.
What “us” lol. You’re by yourself and you’re arguing against most buffs proposed to the Leclerc.
You’re not some kind of master manipulator for lying and censoring posts, just a sad pushover on a power trip
1 Like
We aren’t on a power trip.
& arguing for improvements to Leclerc is not “arguing against most buffs”.
You can’t post incorrect statements about us & expect us to believe you when evidence shows the contrary.
All my posts are present.
I’ve argued for correct armor.
I’ve shown indifference for improved shell as F2 likely wouldn’t be OP, which means not opposing it.
I’ve even addressed how War Thunder simulating regenerative steering & torque converters are a good idea.
All of these everyone here would consider buffs.
I honestly do not understand why you’re so angry about the fact I agree Leclerc needs improved.
No one agrees with you. You’re bringing up gaslighting because I accused you of it after you DMd me.
You basically respond “no u” to every post and accuse everyone else of what you’re doing. Weird behavior. Get your head checked.
1 Like
Example of a gaslighting statement BTW:
As for agreement…
No one agrees with me that Leclerc’s armor should be correct? No one?
You certain about that?
What about regenerative steering should be added?
Or improved torque converter simulation?
OFL F2?
No one agrees that any of those should be added?
Pretty sure we all disagree with you about that.
I never attacked you, you came out swinging and I responded tactfully.
You confuse me attacking someone that wants Leclerc improved.
Are you upset in the way I said my support? Cause fair enough, I can improve that.
But I ain’t apologizing for wanting Leclerc improved.
No one’s agitating others on this forum to my knowledge.
Again intentional misrepresentation of my point and the thread. French people call that “drowning the fish”.
I wonder if there’s a point to all your trolling and spamming (1600 posts in just two months)
Are you some kind of agitator whose goal is to piss off people to get them to post classified info?
What an awkward attempt at deflection
1 Like
Thanks for submitting that; You do good work.
Tho the excessive spalling one is a suggestion, and IDK if it’s a good one.
I just want accurate spalling based on material penned in a consistent manner.
I’d prefer us not be on bad terms with each other, especially if we agree that Leclerc should be improved.
This thread is about wanting Leclerc improved.
Your hostility honestly confuses me.
If you are pro-Leclerc, then I’m not your enemy.
All I can do is apologize if the way I said my support upset you or anyone else.
And if you still think any of us are trolls… that’s an iss-you.
1 Like
Yeah but that’s the problem, what channel exactly ? Do you know one ?
That’s not exactly what I think but I’ll skip the subject for now as it’s not the main concern.
1 Like
Has anyone made or will make a historical report for Leclerc machine guns?
not that i know of, who ever is going to do it should probs put in it can have the 2 machine guns mine as well
2 Likes
Not really. The shell penned the fuel tank outside the hull and it still killed the whole crew. The spall that kills the driver and the gunner should’ve been stopped by an armored wall but wasn’t.
Could argue the same for the spall that killed the commander, but not as clear cut.
But hey, not a bug according to gaijin 🙄
Pretty sure it was done back in the days of the old forum. Gaijin went “lolno” for no reasons.
1 Like
absolutely sickening how gaijin handles this nation. Seriously did a frenchman bully Anton in his youth or something?
6 Likes
The issue is that all things have to be veryified somehow. Without valid sources there is nothing they can really do after something has been implimented. Then also the French Consultant was pretty bad at what he was doing since years already and we’ve been trying to get the attention to it. All we can really do is ask Gaijin with feedback to look at his work and maybe give his position to someone who is more “qualified” without wanting to talk him down as a person.
Don’t blame Gaijin in this instance.
The ex-advisor for China caused issues for that tech tree.
It’s clear there’s something that’s not allowing Gaijin to get accurate information about French vehicles.
And I don’t know of any French speakers attempting to work for Gaijin.
2 Likes
that would make a lot of sense they always seem to be lacking information on french tech not just ignoring France
2 Likes
Uuuh… yes, we should be blaming gaijin if the advisor was an employee. A company is responsible for their employees’ behavior.
And besides, it’s not like gaijin isn’t aware that players who play France are unhappy with how their trees are handled. The fact that they continue to follow the same course instead of fixing things shows that they are part of the issue as well. I mean, I made a bug report about French heavy cruisers missing their AP shells citing two sources and they just closed it saying that there wasn’t enough details. They didn’t say they would look into it, they didn’t ask me if I had sources that would give them more details, they just closed it.
There’s absolutely no reason to believe that the French advisor is the only one at fault, or if they’re even at fault at all. Gaijin are the one who decide what is implemented and what isn’t, as well as how things are implemented in the game. The advisor could be as competent as can be, if gaijin doesn’t want to listen then there’s nothing the advisor can do. “None so deaf as those who will not hear”
6 Likes
some of these closed but sent as a suggestion reports never seem to be added