What “us” lol. You’re by yourself and you’re arguing against most buffs proposed to the Leclerc.
You’re not some kind of master manipulator for lying and censoring posts, just a sad pushover on a power trip
We aren’t on a power trip.
& arguing for improvements to Leclerc is not “arguing against most buffs”.
You can’t post incorrect statements about us & expect us to believe you when evidence shows the contrary.
All my posts are present.
I’ve argued for correct armor.
I’ve shown indifference for improved shell as F2 likely wouldn’t be OP, which means not opposing it.
I’ve even addressed how War Thunder simulating regenerative steering & torque converters are a good idea.
All of these everyone here would consider buffs.
I honestly do not understand why you’re so angry about the fact I agree Leclerc needs improved.
No one agrees with you. You’re bringing up gaslighting because I accused you of it after you DMd me.
You basically respond “no u” to every post and accuse everyone else of what you’re doing. Weird behavior. Get your head checked.
Example of a gaslighting statement BTW:
As for agreement…
No one agrees with me that Leclerc’s armor should be correct? No one?
You certain about that?
What about regenerative steering should be added?
Or improved torque converter simulation?
OFL F2?
No one agrees that any of those should be added?
Pretty sure we all disagree with you about that.
I never attacked you, you came out swinging and I responded tactfully.
You confuse me attacking someone that wants Leclerc improved.
Are you upset in the way I said my support? Cause fair enough, I can improve that.
But I ain’t apologizing for wanting Leclerc improved.
No one’s agitating others on this forum to my knowledge.
Again intentional misrepresentation of my point and the thread. French people call that “drowning the fish”.
I wonder if there’s a point to all your trolling and spamming (1600 posts in just two months)
Are you some kind of agitator whose goal is to piss off people to get them to post classified info?
What an awkward attempt at deflection
Thanks for submitting that; You do good work.
Tho the excessive spalling one is a suggestion, and IDK if it’s a good one.
I just want accurate spalling based on material penned in a consistent manner.
I’d prefer us not be on bad terms with each other, especially if we agree that Leclerc should be improved.
This thread is about wanting Leclerc improved.
Your hostility honestly confuses me.
If you are pro-Leclerc, then I’m not your enemy.
All I can do is apologize if the way I said my support upset you or anyone else.
And if you still think any of us are trolls… that’s an iss-you.
Yeah but that’s the problem, what channel exactly ? Do you know one ?
That’s not exactly what I think but I’ll skip the subject for now as it’s not the main concern.
Has anyone made or will make a historical report for Leclerc machine guns?
not that i know of, who ever is going to do it should probs put in it can have the 2 machine guns mine as well
Not really. The shell penned the fuel tank outside the hull and it still killed the whole crew. The spall that kills the driver and the gunner should’ve been stopped by an armored wall but wasn’t.
Could argue the same for the spall that killed the commander, but not as clear cut.
But hey, not a bug according to gaijin 🙄
Pretty sure it was done back in the days of the old forum. Gaijin went “lolno” for no reasons.
absolutely sickening how gaijin handles this nation. Seriously did a frenchman bully Anton in his youth or something?
The issue is that all things have to be veryified somehow. Without valid sources there is nothing they can really do after something has been implimented. Then also the French Consultant was pretty bad at what he was doing since years already and we’ve been trying to get the attention to it. All we can really do is ask Gaijin with feedback to look at his work and maybe give his position to someone who is more “qualified” without wanting to talk him down as a person.
Don’t blame Gaijin in this instance.
The ex-advisor for China caused issues for that tech tree.
It’s clear there’s something that’s not allowing Gaijin to get accurate information about French vehicles.
And I don’t know of any French speakers attempting to work for Gaijin.
that would make a lot of sense they always seem to be lacking information on french tech not just ignoring France
Uuuh… yes, we should be blaming gaijin if the advisor was an employee. A company is responsible for their employees’ behavior.
And besides, it’s not like gaijin isn’t aware that players who play France are unhappy with how their trees are handled. The fact that they continue to follow the same course instead of fixing things shows that they are part of the issue as well. I mean, I made a bug report about French heavy cruisers missing their AP shells citing two sources and they just closed it saying that there wasn’t enough details. They didn’t say they would look into it, they didn’t ask me if I had sources that would give them more details, they just closed it.
There’s absolutely no reason to believe that the French advisor is the only one at fault, or if they’re even at fault at all. Gaijin are the one who decide what is implemented and what isn’t, as well as how things are implemented in the game. The advisor could be as competent as can be, if gaijin doesn’t want to listen then there’s nothing the advisor can do. “None so deaf as those who will not hear”
some of these closed but sent as a suggestion reports never seem to be added
How is Gaijin supposed to know that the French advisor is doing a good job without a competitor or knowledge of what the ideal is?
-1) By comparing how they perform vs other nations advisor. If they constantly fail to produce the necessary data, it could mean that either that it’s difficult to get information for that nation’s vehicle or that the advisor isn’t doing a good job at finding information, which leads us to
-2) By paying attention to the community. We provide a lot of information in our suggestions, gaijin only has to look at what the community is providing vs what the advisor is providing and what the feedback from the community on the subject is.
But again, I’m not convinced the advisor is at fault. People have been asking for years for an IFV line for France, yet gaijin has only added a single one as premium in the latest patch. It’s not like data on the AMX-13VCI, AMX-10P, VAB 20mm,Vextra or VBCI are hard to get.
Then there’s the very lacking French naval tree which took years to implement for no reasons. Data is again pretty easy to come by as the archives at Chatelletrault are pretty easy to access (wargaming actually commented on how easy it was to get info from them while they were developing World of Warships).
I’m not sure gaijin really cares what he says on the forums and I don’t think much has been reported to the devs.
As for the naval tree and a nice stuffing,
Rank 1: 3 “Jaguar” classes including 1 which is no longer a “Jaguar” and 1 “Bourrasque”
Rank 2: 3 “Aigle” including 3 true C&C
Rank 3: 1 training ship, 1 ship not even French…, 2 Duguay class, and 1 “Fantasque”
Rank 4: 2 Class Sufren, including one with too high a BR, and 1 Emile Bertin
Rank 5: 1 class Courbet and 1 class Bretagne underarmed (for him I still do not understand this choice)
In short, to use a phrase of Gaijin “One of the oldest and largest navies in the world” it took them 6 years to release only half of it and the said half already present is only a multitude of C&C without much difference. While many other possible classes would have made good candidates.
Also, when a large part of the community creates threads like this to discuss errors in the choice of vehicles, weapons, armor, etc., it is because the advisor is not necessarily at the height. And you don’t have to be very smart to figure out that fact. So I wouldn’t claim to want to become a consultant because I don’t have enough knowledge, but I think others have the knowledge to become one. Some may even have the knowledge AND the desire to become one, but if Gaijin does not communicate the desire to recruit one, the motivated players will not be able to guess it and offer their services either.
Arrived at a stage, it may be necessary to create a suggestions for the replacement of the French adviser, perhaps seeing this Gaijin will move a little. Afterwards, as said above, the council may have nothing to do with that, in which case we could not do great things.