What’s the state of bug reports? I’m kinda newbie, never reported anything, not sure where to look.
Abrams bug report made me think about Leclercs and reasons why they aren’t buffed in any way. Basically what’s the Gajin response?
What’s the state of bug reports? I’m kinda newbie, never reported anything, not sure where to look.
Abrams bug report made me think about Leclercs and reasons why they aren’t buffed in any way. Basically what’s the Gajin response?
Gaijin refuses pretty much every evidence shown to them, because they :
Has anyone made any attempts at having the trunion model looked at? i found some pictures and drawings of the gun assembly and the trunion that is modeled seems to be a little lacking in detail. Especially when those details could improve survivability like they do on t72s and t80s.
You can always just submit it anyways, it could help a case if somebody did or bring attention to it again. But knowing gajin they probaly wont look at it
When you say submit it, do you mean here or on the bug reporting forum? I’ve had bad experiences with them before so i’m reluctant to make the effort :(
XLR better get a camo net like the the new SEPV2-3 and a cage like the jaguar.

speaking of the jaguar:
I love KNDS because even though most of the projects won’t be funded or have a use in the future you just get to see many tank concepts in a physical form which is pretty rare and interesting.
you are aware that the CAPINT is funded trough the MGCS project right?
And that its whole purpose is research for the mgcs project
Did I stutter?
you are completly wrong yes, cause that they do in fact get funded and do have a use in the future trough the realisation of the mgcs and the testing of technology for it.
You’re kind of playing on semantics.
I didn’t say CAPINT was literally unfunded or useless. If it is part of MGCS research, then yes, it obviously has some funding and a purpose as a technology demonstrator.
My point was that many KNDS concepts probably won’t be funded and adopted as production vehicles in the exact form we see them. Being funded as a research platform or demonstrator is not the same thing as being funded as a vehicle with a clear service future.
By your definition, any amount of money spent on research would count as “funding,” but that is not obviously not what I meant since the vehicle exist physically and had to a minimum some funding to it. I was talking about full development and adoption, not just research money.
That’s why I like KNDS: even if many of these concepts are only testbeds or stepping stones toward MGCS, they still show them in physical form instead of just CGI, which is rare and interesting.
It was pointed out by Mulatu that the Ascalon showcased here is an L55 instead of the previous L58 of the ES2024 Leclerc EVO demonstrator. It’s interesting that they downgraded the barrel length to the current Rheinmetal 120mm standard.
In a similar vein, the RCH 155mm tracked version of the Boxer 155mm has a gun that is more similar to the CAESAR being 58 caliber instead of the previous 52 iirc. Looks like there’s some tech transfer/fusion between both KNDS entities ?
Hey, all western mbt players should riot on the steam page when they release the abrams devblog.
We sent in a mile long report that a mod denied in 30 mimutes (couldn’t have read it).
Tell the type 10 users.
pff trying to get everyone on the same page is like getting gaijin to read a bug report
Lol true
Leclercs now got the OFL 120 F2 as a stock round. Is it really weaker than F1 in real life?
Looks like every nation at rank 8 got stronger stock apfsds🤔
cough Relikt buff backfiring cough
ignore Type 10 getting nothing
I just want the Leclerc to get its actual armor man, like i deadass got frontal penned by a 2S6 and got killed :(