God do I love the Mistral
which? it is still way better than the fcking stinger whose only purpose is to give away where you are when u fire it at an enemy plane that is not flying completely straight at 600 kph, i got tons of kills with it at ranges i never would have thought it would reach while pulling 6 g more. dunno if their speed is much different atm tho
It’s been open for a year
I’m tired boss…
Whoever decided that rank VI-VII vehicles above 8.7 shouldn’t have access to stock APFSDS should be flogged in front of the masses.
You are completely failing as a game developer if you have to make the state of a player’s newly purchased vehicle absolute unplayable garbage in order to incentivize microtransactions.
5 Likes
Its only 9.7, mostly only rank 7-8 get APFSDS
The 1st report I hope to compile will focus on the AMX-40’s missing NERA arrays in it’s turret, which were suddenly removed with zero explanation from the developers.
Guys I’ve found another post on here that has an insane amount of sources regarding the AMX-40’s, hopefully if anyone in this thread can comb through and translate these sources I can submit a report to get the AMX-40’s turret composite back in a way that the mods will accept.
These GIAT papers seem to mention the turret armor so hopefully someone can translate:
Anything that states the turret has composite armor would be an immense help on getting that report accepted, there are MANY more sources on that post that I could potentially use if anyone could translate them.
1 Like
It does mention composite armor for turret near the end , it’s the first line after Protection.
“Blindages composites cloisonnés en châssis et tourelle ; préblindages latéraux” can be roughly translated to "Composite armor in the hull and turret ; side ‘préblindages’ (no idea how to translate it since I don’t really know the equivalent in english closest would be ‘pre-armor’).
Knowing gaijin they will probably pull a “it’s a earlier AMX-40 variant , therefor , invalid”.
How I know it’s an earlier variant? Well it mention that the engine HP is 1100 hp and not the current 1300hp we have.
I got an like 3+ French sources and even 1 english source directly stating the AMX-40 has composite armor in it’s turret; if this report don’t get accepted I’ma mald so hard
Report is up: Community Bug Reporting System
1 Like
“We have a source that says otherwise” is what I’m expecting.
I hope not, my report about the ammunition rack was accepted so I do have hope that with these numerous sources they will finally restore the AMX-40’s turret composites.
They’ve done it in the past to deny a report with upward of 10 primary and secondary sources because they had a single secondary source, so you shouldn’t rule it out.
Did similar crap for a lot of Vextra’s stuff, and that had significantly more fanfare about it than AMX 40. So I’m not holding my breath on them doing anything, even if they accept it.
1 Like
Seems like Gaijin broke the protection level even more on Leclerc family.
@Smin1080p_WT should we report this?
Seems fine to me. It probably is something odd-out in prot analysis. Have you tried to fire the round and see if you penetrate? I think it should not penetrate
Yeah seems like main problem is the protection analysis, but oddly enough it penetrated once out of five shots.
Doesn’t have proxy fuse right now. Just watched my mistral narrowly miss a gripen.
Wait please don’t tell me my first missile SPAA (SIDAM 25 Mistral) that I’m currently grinding for doesn’t even get proxy… bruh
Hate to bug you when the reports are getting flooded regarding issues with the new update, but if you get the chance could you glance over this re-submitted report about the AMX-40?
it does have proxy, but like all manpads the range of the fuze is not great
2 days now without any response despite over 10 people tagging along…
It took less than a day for the 1st report to get quickly denied, but now it looks like this one is being skipped over.
If this gets buried I might have to re-submit it for a 3rd time…
2 Likes