They have on multiple occasions deviated from the standard to fill gaps until something else is added to replace it.
3 Likes
ok? so what gap does kh38MT fill?
the only one I can think of is that ground RB was actually fun to play for a bit and the devs cant have that
7 Likes
What?
1 Like
that isnt verifying that the photo is real only that it is not 100% fake due to how distorted it looks
with that distortion making it impossible to tell for sure
nobody is forcing you to play top tier
The latter half of that post isn’t talking about just one image, it’s talking about all the evidence provided up until that point.
1 Like
What gap that has to fill by missile that can’t even prove it existence?
4 Likes
IR agm for russia
which is weird because nothing new has been presented other than one brochure
and confirmation that the expo image was a mockup
1 Like
^ That
1 Like
You might think it’s weird, but that is what was said.
You are all fully welcome to disagree, I just pointed out that something had indeed been said when you claimed it hadn’t.
Oh german don’t even have FnF agm for top jet maybe they should have FnF brimstone to fill what they lack right now?
1 Like
IR missile with ~13km target lock range.
They had no 15-18 SAL AGMs to fill that hole though.
Chinese don’t have that too so why Russian is the only one who need it?
2 Likes
This is an entirely different topic that has already been addressed within the “Tonka” post (first time we received Brimstones).
So Russia gets an IR AGM which is game breaking, my question is why was it released before every other nation has a Pantsir equivalent? Anyone with common sense would have waited to release that until there was a counter.
6 Likes
f4f ice has agm65
which you could use to not bump your ground lineup to 13.0
also what part of that involves giving it better optics than some targeting pods?
You are free to make suggestions for anything that could fill that gap.
Never said that.
That is a different discussion entirely. This topic is on the missile and if the amount of evidence for it’s existence is enough for it to be in game, any other discussion is off topic.
Off topic.
3 Likes
its not though, it is directly linked to the lack of evidence and information for this missile and the proposed reason for addition being to fill a gap
tell me where they found a source that doesnt exist to give it those optics
or why it is reasonable to add better optics to the missiles disposable seeker than the carrying aircrafts onboard optics
16 Likes