The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

[Zannafrancy12]

i want it but im not exactly exited for it to go to uk or russia. feels a bit weird

[Smugspite]

it would be the UK as its a sub tree (as much as it urks me)

[Zannafrancy12]

true but idk, they’ll probably make it a premium or event(hope not cause im tired of unique missiles being stuck on event vehicles)

[MythicPi]

The new evidence of the brochure from the Zhuhai airshow in 2024 is honestly a very solid point in favor of at least it existing in an operational way unfortunately.

I never proved the missile did not exist. The evidence against its existence up until the Zhuhai brochure was posted was pretty strong imo, but if the Zhuhai brochure is real, think the missile is atleast to the point of being a prototype weapon.

That being said, I do have some doubts about the Zhuhai brochure.

1. Its super weird its in english. Theres not really any reasons for it to be I’d think, seeing as its a chinese airshow, and its a russian weapon not being marketted to english speaking nations.
2. The image of the missile mounted on the jet is kinda weird.
3. Not sure what JSC “TMC” is, afaik the manufacturer is supposed to be KTRV

There are also some other oddities;

1. If there really are pictures of the Kh-38MT as seen on the brochure, why have they never been used before
2. Why remove the Kh-38MTE from the most up to date version of the ROE website if the missile is still being advertised
3. Is the brochure really from Zhuhai 2024 (theres no supporting evidence of this)

That being said, I cant really conclusively disprove the brochure, there’s just stuff that bug me about it, so as of now, I sit on the fence. I’ve updated the threads original post to reflect the new info.

[Zannafrancy12]

@MythicPi

The new evidence of the brochure from the Zhuhai airshow in 2024 is honestly a very solid point in favor of at least it existing in an operational way unfortunately.

i dont see how you can say that

[ron_2303]

@MythicPi

Its super weird its in english. Theres not really any reasons for it to be I’d think, seeing as its a chinese airshow, and its a russian weapon not being marketted to english speaking nations.

it is still an international airshow as far as i know

@MythicPi

The image of the missile mounted on the jet is kinda weird.

Gunjob explained that, it has to do with it being scanned using Adobe Scan

@Gunjob

Images from the brochure look like there were taken with Adobe Scan, which is why it has the brightening effect on the white areas.

No brightening effect;

Spoiler

Brightening;

Spoiler

So the document won’t be an original photo, and that’s not a great tact to take.

@Gunjob

Yeah I wouldn’t pursue the image being faked, as the photos aren’t original as the brightening effect alters them but makes the text much more readable and fixes issues with lighting/reflectivity of the pages.

With all the evidence presented I’m confident in the weapon existing in some form now, and at the very least there is now enough evidence for it to be in game.

@MythicPi

Not sure what JSC “TMC”

idc about that either

[Smugspite]

there is still at least chance for nerfs such as there is no way its 25x and 3rd gen thermals

[Zannafrancy12]

are we really acting like a SINGLE picture on a brochure that we dont even have our hands on is enough evidence right now?

[ron_2303]

no it is the Brochure itself
the origanl argument was that the 38mt was canceld because it wasnt seen in brochures for atleast 5 years

@MythicPi

I dont think it has even gotten beyond the drawing board and made it to the testing stage, since if it had, they would presumably present a modernized mockup of the missile or the manufacturer would at the very least have an actual picture of the thing instead of needing to use artist renditions of the supposed missile for brochures.

… well and also the fact that they didnt use a render

[sudo_su1]

@MythicPi

Not sure what JSC “TMC” is, afaik the manufacturer is supposed to be KTRV

TMC is the English acronym and KTRV is the Russian acronym

JSC TMC = Joint Stock Company Tactical Missiles Corporation
KTRV = КТРВ (In Cyrillic) = Корпорация Тактическое Ракетное Вооружение

[MythicPi]

@Zannafrancy12

i dont see how you can say that

Why?

[Zannafrancy12]

there have been many arguments so far, mostly pointless, but what we do know is that as far as the evidence we’ve seen there is no proof of the missile being used or produced, like again we have 2 pictures and THATS IT, 1 mockup and 1 brochure we only have pictures of

[MythicPi]

Ty for the explanation

[Zannafrancy12]

there is 1 picture of a the missile on a rail(of which we dont have in hour hands) and 1 picture of a mockup, that it as far as evidence goes, like at best the missile is in its prototype stage, but i wager its far more likely that its simply shelved, ill keep using kh69 as an example of a pretty advanced weapon that was showed first in 2022 and has entered active service and has seen combat already.

now whatever the IRL discussion may be i feel we’re forgetting we’re debating war thunder here, i dont think we have enough evidence to allow such a strong weapon to remain in the game.

[ron_2303]

there might be an argument, for the seeker to be nerfed to 2. or 1. gen thermals

cant confirm or deny the following statement tho, as iam not knoledgable about IR seekeres

@tripod2008

It’s nice to see some hard data, but it makes things almost certain that the Seeker is improperly implemented, based on these numbers.

The “Self Homing Head Sensitivity” assmed to be noise equivalent temperature difference (NE∆T) of 270 Milli-Kelvin (mK) is ridiculously high for a “third generation” system, let alone requiring a 4 kelvin difference to provide sufficient contrast for a track to be maintained, needing “16 units” of contrast Is not great, especially for a brochure means that they’re not using a Histogram or other contrast stretching techniques to improve performance the same way the IIR/ CCD Maverick or many other Electro-Optical systems do.

claims that NE∆T values of 25~35 mK can be expected of an Cooled InSb Focal plane Array (AMBER Radiance I)

“Our cameras, having a noise equivalent temperature difference (NE∆T) of only 25 mK, can detect extremely small variations in source irradiance. NE∆T indicates the required temperature difference of a particular pixel with respect to the background to obtain a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of unity”

In short surfaces that are within a a quarter of a degree of one another have the same return(and depending on what is actually displayed it may be far worse), which is a magnitude worse than commercial gear from the late 90’s.

Sure with limits as above you will assuredly get passable contrast within a scene, but in no way shape or form will you retain details, and everything will be blown out and blobby.

[MythicPi]

Though I think gaijin pulled those numbers out of their rear, I dont have anything to disprove them beyond logic, and thats never gonna fly with gaijin.

[ron_2303]

@MythicPi

look at the message i replied to

@MythicPi

Though I think gaijin pulled those numbers out of their rear, I dont have anything to disprove them beyond logic, and thats never gonna fly with gaijin.

[PercussionCap]

@MythicPi

The evidence against its existence up until the Zhuhai brochure was posted was pretty strong imo, but if the Zhuhai brochure is real, think the missile is atleast to the point of being a prototype weapon.

We don’t even know if the missile mounted to the aircraft in the brochure is actually a 38MT. It has deliberately been taken from quite far away and is of poor quality.

[ron_2303]

@PercussionCap

if the missile mounted to the aircraft in the brochure is actually a 38MT

then please enlighten me what else it might be?

[PercussionCap]

Could be an ML or a mockup. We have no evidence of it being functional.