this isnt proof though.
1 Like
i could express deliver a 38mt into your living room and you would still think it is fake
4 Likes
true that blurry missile is CLEARLY exactly the thing we have no further evidence of ever being tested, mounted or anything like that and still no evidence being tested = should not be added
1 Like
Check it for yourself my guy, stats are a public thing in this game.
Go see how I’m abusing 38MTs on 30SM and SU-34.
you can say whatever you want it isnt going to manifest the missile into reality.
Well, if you can deliver it without getting arrested, it’s probably fake :)
who said it is going to be in one pice after it “arrived” /s
1 Like
Imo I find it weird how OP (on Weibo) posted this now (well, yesterday, but you get what I mean) out of no where, not including other content aside from Grom info and the MLE. Why not post everything? Over 20 pages are skipped and there could be more afterwards. If I’m not mistaken, I’ve seen this thread, or at least some variation of it also talking about the KH-38MT’s “proof” on Beidu and whatnot gaining some traction, so maybe it got the attention of the user?. Also, I could be wrong, but I think cover page needs to be sent too for proof, but that might just be a thing for bug reports, idk about situations like these
8 Likes
of a mockup
1 Like
You can keep saying that, but it doesn’t make it true.
It is not uncommon for marketing material of hardware that has not been built yet to use the predicted or planned performance.
1 Like
for content farming
he uploaded pictures of the KH-31 part of the brochure as well
2 Likes
its not uncommon, its literally practice when buying into weapons that are still being developed lol
1 Like
Yes
But with all weapons and especially with more modern ones it pretty much boils down to taking the manufacturer/country’s word …
Unless you want Gaijin to order one of each weapon and test them in-house …
But… they don’t accept the manufactuers word.
The bug reports are littered with “we don’t believe”
3 Likes
That works in cases where the thing has confirmed existence.
I have a brochure of ADATS Mk.III on a BMP-3 hull. Guess if this one is real.
4 Likes
Can you post a picture? Sounds cool as hell
He in fact posted multiple posts from this brochure
Summary
First 20 pages can be just usless info about company and etc like this
Summary
2 Likes
Still doesn’t change the fact you benefit from them being this OP, also the amount of hipocrisy is crazy in this thread.
2 Likes
Ah, true. Looking at it however, one of the images for the KH-31 clearly says it’s inert. Correct me if I’m wrong here, but isn’t that close to being mockup, aside from being able to be mounted and other things (ofc dangerous stuff like warhead or fuel) being removed? What stops it from being the same for the MT(E)? I guess it still somewhat counts as it’s mounted, but I’m not sure
Just a question, in case the inert definition is correct
4 Likes