So I’m wondering, what will be the next avenue worth exploring in order to remove “the thorn” ?
It is also a “what if” Brochure store that did not see wide service.
1 Like
Proof of carriage of the -38MT, not the -38MTE on the airframes it is currently implemented on.
2 Likes
easy fix:
rename the kh38mt to kh38mte
Those are the same missiles, just like R-73 and R-73E.
German MiG is carrying missiles it shouldn’t have just because it can fit them both, since they’re the same thing.
none of the 9.12 / 9.13 migs should have r-27er and r-27et but the r-73 instead
3 Likes
The F-15E with its x30 GBU-53 load out would ruin A LOT of peoples days lmao.
I pray it comes soon
1 Like
Yeah, but much like Brimstone and Spear-3. They’ll need to come up with some form of Quantity mitigation for GRB, that doesnt restrict them in other gamemodes.
Idk man… seems sus.
even if you really try to see a 38ml there the ring would be to big and the seeker isnt pointing straight but downwards
38ml:
comparison of that missile to the 38mt mockup shown at marks:
4 Likes
crazy how a goddamn refraction its really a difference maker on an extremely low quality pic
So it’s a mockup suspended on that plane and not an actual missile.
Its the large silver ring im looking at which throws me off.
MTE isnt supposed to have it
Like the difference in color between the body and the seekerhead.
a mock up that needs safty pins for the launch rails so it isnt accidentally fired on the ground?
3 Likes
No its what i suspect to be a promotional photoshop (like the UHT with the chin cannon)
1 Like
original image
in the same brochure they also tell some details on the seeker itself
2 Likes
Mandatory procedure.
1 Like
sure
it is funny how you ppl go from saying the russian army is the most unogranized ever to saying they always follow procedure
3 Likes
This AIM-152 mockup also has a safety pin and yet we know for sure it’s nonfunctional.
2 Likes