The circle boundaries are cut if you look.
Theres a section missing.
1 Like
especially if the clamp claim is to be believed
1 Like
Even then,look at what would be the edge of where the seeker head joins, its missing part of the circle transitioning into a flat line across the entire photo vertically
1 Like
It very much is.
You first claimed that the metallic ring extended way back to the mounting bracket.
Look, missile looks like a 38MT based on it’s shape and looks of the seeker. You focusing on the markings that might be created who knows when is funny.
Whataboutism or whataboutery (as in “what about …?”) is a pejorative for the strategy of responding to an accusation with a counter-accusation instead of a defense against the original accusation.
Clearly.
3 Likes
i didnt?
lmao when
i aint denying that it looks like a 38MT or MTE.
im questioning if the image is doctored which is most likely is
ELA reveals some damning editing fingerprints
there are irregular ‘regular shapes’ (random squares) as well as areas of differing pixel densities which usually points towards an image of different resolution being overlaid onto another image.
this is the area on and around the seekerhead
the changes in brightness itself are proof of being doctored as per the ELA definition:
12 Likes
checked, again not actual valid proof
I can say the aim9b has thrust vectoring. source? brochure i found from the electric boogaloo
6 Likes
then plot twist its a Kh-38ML
1 Like
Everything is photoshopped if you believe hard enough.
1 Like
objectively speaking. youre on the lower ground here and saying
isnt really helping your case nor even correct. an image either is or isnt doctored.
facts dont depend on belief
2 Likes
At this point in time there’s no reason to continue speaking to you, as it’s obvious you aren’t backing out from your personal beliefs, which is fine.
2 Likes
i could say the same to you and id be more logically sound as you clearly cannot object to the ELA i have provided
1 Like
Judging by your picture, even the grass in the distance is tampered with.
2 Likes
That’s the sky lmao
And the outline is of the missile(s)
Not the grass
I find it funny to see your photoshop posts after you liked this post. You’ve seen a million photoshops but you haven’t seen “average speed” in the brochure.
3 Likes
No where near as unbalanced
Like the israeli chaparral? Which hsd its smokeless missiles “broken”(we all know it was intentional) and then was promptly downtiered?
id say u got a bad sense o humour lol
(context: hes questioning the 38MTs high top speed especially how it more or less remains so damn fast up till impact whereas the average speed listed in the brochure is lower which means that the missile should slow down a fair bit more)
i didnt look at the stats. only the image since thats kinda what this thread is trying to find. (proof of imaged Kh-38MTs)
3000 kh38mte of war thunder forums
Outlines of the ground and parts of the aircraft itself can be seen as well. Imagine photoshopping something that’s already in your possession in it’s physical form, doesn’t make any sense to me.
@Zannafrancy12
If something gets broken it might go down in BR.
You thinking it’s done intentionally is a whole different story.
No, they are clearly misinterpreting average speed for it’s maximum one.
Poster literally asked where did Gaijin get it’s top speed of 750m/s or M2.2 from, when it says it’s speed is around 380m/s in the brochure.
The same poster tried to claim KH-29 missiles are overperforming with their maximum speed, while citing Wikipedia sentence that has “citation needed” added to it. On the same page you can find different speed values that align with what is in the game.
1 Like