That’s cheap. I assumed that “It totally blows the competition away” refers to the entire package, just like it makes a massive difference if you launch AGM-65Ds from an A-10A late or an F-16C. If you were refering to the weapon in isolation, my bad, I didn’t expect anyone to make an argument that bad. It very obviously is the best IIR AGM currently in game, no one would argue otherwise.
1 Like
Best at being a non-threat, just like all other AAs.
29TDs are bad for top tier on their own and when you strap them onto a terrible airframe like SU-34 it just isn’t enough. Having 6 of them doesn’t help either.
Can we stop playing word games. You calling it a non-threat just like other AA is at worst a lie and at best, being disingenuous. The Pantisr is the best AA at countering Arial threats. The sole reason being that it has the best situational awareness, highest missile count, and can track multiple targets allowing for quick reaction time from one target to another.
No other spaa has this capability. There’s a reason why you will never see long range agm launches from aircraft when Pantsirs are present and if you do, you don’t have to worry about them.
Would the Kh-59 (IR variant) be a good replacement for the Kh-38MT? It’s a much less OP agm that being it’s subsonic, has gps and IOG. It’ll be relatively similar to the Hammer.
It is the best agm regardless of platform. You can put the Kh-38 on a biplane and it’ll still perform good because the Kh-38 does all the heavy lifting for you.
You cannot say the same for the Mavericks as you’ve already mentioned. Even on the best platform, it still performs poorly because of it’s terrible flight performance.
6 Likes
not
And your proof of argument is? Because they clearly do.
Me when I lie.
Brimstone is right in front of your eyes. Tornado got it first and I don’t think tornado is such an OP plane that Brimstones just needed that nerf.
8 Likes
Clearly from what perspective? Do you know how promise based economics work in case of highly corrupt governments? Or unreformed soviet based militaries? When I say that everything ru delivers is >50% a lie - I mean it.
1 Like
So that’s what you’re going to base it on? ok
Thank god.
Isn’t the turret ring correct? America hasnt had to fight anyone that wasn’t 30 years behind them at least since like the 60’s, probably not a lot of pressure to fix that, and tanks irl dont brawl inside 500m constantly or have mouse aim, so it might not even be that huge of an issue.
1 Like
I dont know, they seem convinced htere is an “issue” but I dont actually really know what that issue is
Not even close.
The ring sits too high, when it should be nested, creating more of a volumetric hell, while being flat thick enough to defeat auto cannons.
Nor is the armor layout.
Still slower than reality
2 Likes
You have any better basis?
Here’s some outlets. Mind you - some of them are known propaganda circulators. Which makes situation a magnitude worse.
1 Like
They’re still producing these pods apparently so.
Don’t need to say much else.
huh I dont remember this, I assume you mean the Jaguar which wasnt AGMs it was 2 LGBs our first plane with TGP and AGMs was the harrier which as far as I know wasnt the first plane in game with a TGP and AGM
gonna be honest just isnt worth talking to the clear russian mains, they have no reason to change their mind because if they did they might see that they are playing on easy
2 Likes
Yeah… Im surprised they haven’t started arguing for needing KH-38MT buffed yet
1 Like
so does this mean we can remove KH38MT ?
2 Likes
they are in some spots
In theory, but with soviet tech, you never know.
1 Like