Wy would we need national opinion on that? That’s kind of a different matter. The separation is the same. Copemains cope and main. Everyone else is questioning it. We checked ru forums. Well I did.
There is no option of “Wait for information to come to a decision.” thus I was forced to vote “No.”
The poll is too limiting in options.
2 Likes
Fair enough
1 Like
One of the reasons I am not voting is cause it doesn’t bother me if it stays or goes.
My only thing is if it stays the seeker needs to be nerfed to something more realistic for what it would be.
2 Likes
Also a fair way to go about it.
The only “negative” thing for me that comes from this is air simulator, but laser guided would work though it is slower.
1 Like
I mean with ML they still can stay outside of SPAA range as well as guide all 6 at once. BUT, they would be FAIRLY limited while trying that. Skill cap. Which is gonna make everyone’s current problem with it go away forever tbh.
3 Likes
ML is actually pretty potent. Yeah it’s not FnF but with the speed of the 38 it’s time to target is pretty good. Plus the IOG does allow you to launch outside of SPAA range giving you a solid advantage against SPAA.
1 Like
2 Likes
They should add the F-47 as well and just wait for information
4 Likes
No clue, I’ve not popped into the Russian forums for a long time.
Your guess is as good as mine.
That’s not a Kh-38 problem. This was a problem long before the Kh-38 was added. People have been crying bloody murder about CAS being imbalanced since the worst weapon in the skies was mk103 HVAP. They wanted to remove the mk103’s from the horten back then. The EXACT same as what’s going on right now where they couldn’t find conclusive documents about the horten being armed with 103’s or whether they would have been issued HVAP. They wanted the plane disarmed then too. All that happened is that mk103’s shot dispersion was made a little worse, and something comparable like a slightly worse seeker is about as much as you can realistically expect with the kh-38
What we have here is a problem with gaijin placing SPAAGs at too high of a BR across the entire spectrum of ground battles, and top tier needing theater level AAA to keep the skies clear. A problem with airfields being too close to the battlefield, and the potency of air spawns being dramatically underestimated. Removing the KH-38 won’t change anything whatsoever and you’ll just go back to getting splattered by slightly worse missiles. It wasn’t too long ago that the F-16’s were the unstoppable CAS menance. So you can keep wasting effort with the goal of switching which specific missile kills you every day, or you can focus your efforts on getting proper air defenses in place to stop any plane from having free reign.
1 Like
I’d say both are to blame, KH-38 IS more of a menace on the Su30 than the F16 AGM meta by a lot
1 Like
It was in no way necessary, gaijin could’ve simply added an F-2A early, they chose not to, whether cause they couldn’t be assed to research the F-2 properly to know an early would’ve been viable to add, or cause they didn’t feel like making the model for it, idk.
2 Likes
Give me back S-13DF
from what I saw in russian forum they arent even aware of the drama happening here around kh38mt existing, they seem to be happy about it (who would have thought they would like their propaganda wunderwaffe)
when I searched “kh38mt doesnt exist” russians just get mad at anyone saying that and try to reverse it and say “prove that it doesn’t exist”
1 Like
hvap arent even bad irl and smh gaijin makes it shattered like rock
ROCK DONT SHATTER THEY CRACK
(* definitely does not exist)
16 Likes
Any response from the devs?
Keep asking and they might.
Can’t because it does not exist and Gaijin don’t wanna admit they’re wrong and being double standard.
Even Smin don’t even come here and say something like he usually does something tell me this is not normal.
2 Likes