The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

Machinery of War Discussion Aircraft
,
4392

Ight’ let’s sort this out:

Who here has used the Kh-38MT?

  • Have used
  • Have not used
0 voters

If you have used it, would you want it to stay or go based on evidence provided in this thread?
ONLY VOTE ON POLL 2 IF YOU HAVE USED THE Kh-38MT
also vote on poll 1 first so I can better track of people who have voted.

  • Keep it
  • Remove it
0 voters

edit: 2 people voted to have it gone but didn’t vote that they’ve used it on poll 1 and its hurting me T-T

edit 2: only 15 people (as of 1:39 pm CST 4/23/25) have said that they have used the Kh-38MT, so there should only be 15 votes on poll 2, but there are 22 votes, so whoever those extra 7 votes are, sort your stuff out.

4393

okay how Brimstone break physics can you prove that?
far as people know LOAL brimstone is real compared to KH-38MT
and there are picture of it being carry by
Harrier
Tornado
EFT
even test fire by Apache

image
image1200×630 63.3 KB

6 Likes
4394

go ahead and explain how brimstone breaks physics lmao

4395

What “wavelength” we going for here? cause radar wavelengths can vary from 0,1mm to over 1m

You can either have a decent discussion, and not be a wido or not.

I have the radar size here from the missile however I wasn’t able to find the exact frequency of the radar waves.

even with LOAL that still makes 0 sense it would not effect the range of hte radar reflector all it does mean is it can lock after its launching.

1 Like
4396

Go read the entire conversation. I didn’t say anywhere that the Brimstone breaks physics.

Asking me that takes longer than just googling it. The Brimstone uses a 94 GHz mmW radar. Do you need the diameter too or can you find that on your own?

4397

Screenshot 2025-04-23 215601

6 Likes
4398

beat me to it

4399

[…] asking for an implementation of the Brimstone […]
That implementation being FnF and no LOAL, as pointed out in the exact same post you took that quote from.

4400

but Brimstone LOAL is not break physics or fake
“It Real” even more real than entire existence of KH-38MT

2 Likes
4401

please find where someone asked for a physics breaking brimstone then?

so far its just asking for mode 2 people want as a balancer to the fake putinium missile

4402

i think what he means to say is that brimstone cant lock targets from far away using its own MMW seeker, making it a bit tricky to use in crowded scenarios with possible teamkills

4403

Just checking in, Still no proof?

4 Likes
4404

Given it is able to ID the thing its targeting, I think giving it IFF wouldnt be unreasonable if they are really that concerned about it.

IRL you wouldnt have Leopards vs Leopards for example, so a little bit of creative license for a situation that wouldnt normally exist IRL wouldnt be unreasonable

4405

just the same stuff as always.

1 Like
4406

Well using IR guided and SAL missiles have the same problem as they can lose track or be fired wrong in certain situations and then still deal splash damage to friendlies.

4407

not a sauasage mate

1 Like
4408

just killing times while waiting someone at gaijin competent enough to give us a prove of it existence. (which probably can’t)

6 Likes
4409

i check in on this thread every few hours for a BS gaijin response because they also cant prove its real or to see if there’s a stona threadlock

5 Likes
4410

:)

I’m amazed

2 Likes
4411

almost like its a fake missile

;-)

5 Likes