imagine someone not being chronicaly in the forum
2 Likes
LOL
What’re u trying to prove to me?
trying to prove apples with peanuts
Seems like it
I meant the same thing in both messages.
Mythic wrote it as “proof of non existence”, which i don’t totally agree with, as it should be “lack of proof for its existence”, but that’s a detail really
However none of this matters, because as Necronomica said earlier, non-existence can’t be proven. This means the missile should be removed from the game until its existence can be proven. In soon-to-be 4000 messages, nobody was able to prove that the missile indeed exists…
Is that clearer ?
3 Likes
That statement is absolutely not true. You can prove non-existence in these fields but its standardly much harder so it’s impractical. I can prove for example that TV-8 tank never existed or other concepts which never went to prototype but it must be well documented.
1 Like
The fact that the topic starter in the first post is engaged in proving non-existence.
Ok? And?
He’s building a strawman.
8 Likes
yeah not much of a point to talk to him he has one thing and its a choice of words thats his entire argument lmao
1 Like
Which parts outdated? I scrolled through the new messages quick but didnt see any new info provided?
Now show me the exact thing but with a tank, I know you can’t.
You still call the 2017 missile MLE, and some people are mad at you using the wording “proof of not existing”
As I’ve already stated dozens of times in this thread, no single piece of evidence is a linchpin to the theory that the missile never made it past the conceptual/mockup stage.
The fact the Kh-38ML has been widely claimed to have been used in combat while the Kh-38MT has never been claimed to have been used in combat is just an additional piece of evidence suggesting the missile has not reached an operational level. Be it due to financial, technical, or developmental reasons.
Stop wasting everyones time by arguing the same point over and over.
14 Likes
Ight, ill modify the thread a little.
As for the MAKS 2017 one, I’m not sure if I should change it tbh. The original news article claims it to be a SALH seeker and calls it an MLE, the apparent manufacturer of the mockup called it an MTE but still said it was a SALH head. The official manufacturer of the missile also does not use the MAKS 2017 mockup in the brochure for the MTE, it still used the MAKS 2009 one in 2021.
Edit: There, I added some additional info on point 2 mentionning the information regarding the MAKS 2017 mockup is conflicting and changed the wording regarding the “evidence of the missile not existing” to “evidence the missile has never left the conceptual/mockup stage”.
2 Likes
That’s not how this game works.
name another fictional weapon that has never been test fired and added for no reason, ill wait because I can already see it you will bring up the Ho-Ri and the F16AJ (both of which most people agree should be removed)
3 Likes
You answered it yourself. I don’t see 3500+ posts about those nor polls with 1000+ votes. I guess things being fake aren’t the real reason people are being this uppity.