The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

Nothing has changed since the post started.

yup

22 Likes

b-b-b-but russian top tier air needs them or there wont be a reason to play them!!!

/s

1 Like

surely
image

22 Likes

It boggles the mind that Gaijin a) failed so utterly in adding the thing in the first place and b) failed to act and made it worse in the time since it was introduced.

2 Likes

B R U H

U were so surprised that one dude dont know any cons of su34 and su25 yet when i asked u what are the cons u say this lmao. Jeez… lemme rephrase it for u yet again.

What are the cons? (Not in ur opinion)

Scroll above and you’ll find it, not like they aren’t obvious.

What? A strike fighter cant doghfight? What a shocker. So what are the cons again?

maybe on the russian forums. this whole thread is prime proof of seethe with the primary reason that it favours russia.

The amount of planes that have been hammered down with FM nerfs and uptiers just 'cause american players couldn’t fight them

me when the thread still hasnt shown that the missile is real and is just people saying “because X was OP for Y time Z should be allowed to be OP” because reparations or cope or something

Can people actually discuss that there is only maybe a handful of photos and all only of a mockup dummy. nothing further at all nor any remainants of a MT found in places of combat you would anticipate it to have made a debut in.

14 Likes

they still gonna find a way to disregard ur question and go back to “itz riel vro yu US coping lmao”

1 Like

If you plan to use it to find targets from 30km away that thermal optic will need to be cooled or it will lose it’s sensitivity.

Thermals is another thing that Russia are yet again behind on compared to the West. Especially Germany IRL the Pumas thermals are incredible

Aren’t the French the best thermal manufacturers in Europe

I don’t think nationallity matters, if this missile was American, French or Swedish and it turned out to be fake people would still complain until the forums burst.

2 Likes

Germans would argue it, they make the best ocular devices lenses etc.

Schmidt and Bendner
Leica

To name a few.

Many strike aircraft share the same cons, you are on the good path.

Safran makes PASEO sights, so good US got them

Also if Germany is so good at optics, how come they don’t make TGP?

Well, someone has the develop new Leopards )))))

There is a difference between manufacturing high quality lenses for optics and manufacturing high quality digital sensors for optics.

Would a really nice set of lenses help a thermal imager? Yeah, sure. But it’s still a thermal imager even without really nice lenses.

Plus, France also has fairly nice lens manufacturers. The scopes for their modern sniper rifles are known to be of high quality.

1 Like