The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

[GHOST_KING5710]

@UniqueScorpions

zestorer

Flakpanzer IV (3 cm Flakvierling) ‘Zerstörer 45’

poll In the later stages of the Second World War, the Germans lost control over the skies and their ground forces had to endure extensive enemy air attacks. The use of self-propelled anti-aircraft guns (SPAAGs) based on half-track chassis offered some way to fight back, but these were themselves highly vulnerable, as they lacked proper armor protection. A SPAAG based on a tank chassis was more desirable. Starting from 1944, the German focus was on producing such vehicles based on the Panzer IV …

The vehicle in game is real but it’s not Zerstörer 45, at least not in its intended form

In regards of the Zerstörer 45

[1600px-GarageImage_Zerstörer_45] This is not the Zerstörer 45 the Mobelwage chassis was only used for testing of the guns and never designated nor met to be the Flakpanzer IV 3cm Flakvierling (Zerstörer 45), the programme was to upgrade the wirbelwind by changing the guns from the quad 20mm to the quad 30mm, and as you can see the Mobelwage don’t meet the requirements set by the programme. [V5SDASm] [TRkfxGU] [y6PmC64] [bPLVbeJ] [5U6hOPW] Now ppl will say Gaijin went with what was act…

[Bloodpörne]

If there’s no pictures of the weapon being mounted operationally on an aircraft and then pretending that the weapon exists just because it was on a brochure means Gaijin broke their own rules of implementation. It shouldn’t have been added in the first place regardless if you believe there is a grey area of certainty that it even exists. It should be removed until there is proper evidence because right now there isn’t.

[Segment]

Against the rules? How do you think SRAAM appeared on the Harrier GR.1 and PGM on the Tornado? And many, many others. It’s funny that you are only touched by the Kh-38.

[dotSHINI]

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

[MythicPi]

I’m not too well versed on the history of both those munitions but…

@Segment

How do you think SRAAM appeared on the Harrier GR.1

@Segment

PGM on the Tornado

Actual pictures of the things on aircrafts are pretty easy to find, unlike the Kh-38MT, which has never been pictured on an aircraft (or in any functional capacity afawk)

[dotSHINI]

Pgms literaly have been sold tp UAE and been used in interactions 😂

[Bloodpörne]

I think others have already delved on that topic and answered those questions earlier. I’d rather stay on topic in this thread. This is a much more pertinent issue to how Gaijin implements obscure vehicles or equipment without proper material.

[Segment]

@MythicPi

LOL. One photo with the Hunter, on which the SRAAM was tested. Another Harrier T with mass-dimensional mockups of missiles. Where are the photos “pictures of the weapon being mounted operationally” on the Harrier GR.1?

@MythicPi

This is the Tornado GR.1, on which the PGMs were tested (the only one of all). How did the PGMs appear on the Tornado GR.4, if they were not even accepted into service by the RAF?

[dotSHINI]

Jesus you are grasping for straws.
We are talking about the existence of the ammunition for the vehicles. They did in matter exist and work.

Gajin adds stuff tp vehicles whe they have been cleared to carry them. The tornado gr 4 might not have used them in RAF service but it was cleared to carry and use them.

This cant be done with the KH38MT when the missle doesnt exist in the first place.
Like i said grasping at straws to argue stuff because u dont find real examples

[BBCRF]

You need to look at the manufacturer’s website, not the exporter’s.

[Segment]

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

[dotSHINI]

Not like it would change much.
Else u could already have shared that yourself since long ago if it would have proofed anything.

Since you havent it likely doesnt proof the existence of the KH 38 MT either

[Rennie1018129]

Show us the kh-38mt mounted on literally any aircraft at all if you want to go down that route

[ARK_BOI]

@MotorolaCRO

As for SU-34, just because you are supersonic and have ARHs doesn’t mean you’re remotely competitive against other jets, especially in a GRB setting.

seem having best SPAA covering their as forcing enemy CAP to stay low and stick with horizontal maneuver still aren’t enough for Russian i guess
GR4 don’t have FnF Brimstone for balance reasons even its worse platform possible and no best SPAA covering their as yet SU-34 is exception for KH-38ML that probably not even exist heh despite having all covered.

[dotSHINI]

Buddy gr4 is an upgraded gr1. They are the same vehicles. They didnt lose earlier capacities.
Seriously grasping for straws

[dotSHINI]

He is crying nooo the weapon has never been shown on that exact aircraft version.

While the KH38MT existence cant even be proven. Thats worlds apart from a standard

[Segment]

@dotSHINI

Buddy gr4 is an upgraded gr1. They are the same vehicles. They didnt lose earlier capacities.
Seriously grasping for straws

Torgado never had the ability to carry PGM. There was only one test aircraft with such a capability. And of course, weapons are always integrated into aircraft that are not going to be installed, bought and used. It’s so easy.

[dotSHINI]

UAE literaly bought them to use on their aircraft tornados.

[DevilO6]

@Segment

There was only one test aircraft with such a capability.

The only difference between that tornado and normal one, was that this one was a recce version, replacing guns with cameras.

[dotSHINI]

@Segment seriously how about you prove the KH38MT being fired at all?
Pgm , sraams as of right now will always be more realsitic then the KH38MT.
You are comparing apples with peaches and your argument is completly useless, cause u cant prove the KH 38MT and are grasping for straws