but they still advertise the others, and there is no evidence it is being used in any current conflicts
i mean just making the head would be sufficient for this argument lmao but bro having a 1:1 missile as an ornament would be badass
Yeah. It is not like any of the Kh-38 aircraft lack the ability to designate ML. Hell, they gave 30SM the T220.
majorly the L one, which doesnt have the delicate IIR seekers
wouldnt bet on that, the SU-34 and SU25m3 might go down further since they dont have a targeting pod.
and the cameras are gimped.
SU-30 wont be affected of course
There are a lot of examples of Kh38 being used, unfortunatly its not often specified what version.
a literal trophy remind me that i won an arguement online
i mean what tech leak? its largely acknowledged even by russians themself they lack behind in the thermals area
and? there is still no evidence of use and if anything there is evidence that russian manufacturing or thermals cant keep up with demand without installing very high end systems in one time use missiles
and without creating a national security concern through sekret dokuments
everyone has their own perks and downs, maybe they had upper hands in some specific areas when it comes to IIR seekers?
doubt
ill see how it goes
Still wouldnt drop past 11.7 so effectively the same place for ground.
yes but the images are easily identifiable as KH-38ML due to the grid infront of the seeker
i just realize i also have to render it💀😭
Leos, Challengers, Abrams, T90, T80 not getting droned ?
Why is this getting flagged ??
1 Like
they are installing 2nd gen systems into their newest tanks (which by their own claims are comparable to decades old western systems), I cant imagine them dedicating any production of more advanced systems for disposable missiles
1 Like
its not that long ago russia specialy imported them all, i doubt they had a special area if you look at everything, resolution wise etc they lacked behind massively. More often then not russian vehicles get buffed in this area in war thunder with the way gajin handles thermal generations and resolutions.
back to my fcaams example, a model is not prove of existence of an armament
thats not how it works
Thats when we get to see it drop, there are plenty of videos of strikes claiming to use Kh38’s in which we only see it before impact. I was looking just now at a thermal video from the air of a strike on a bridge. However it’s not enough as nothing used in the video is confirmable.