The Kh-38MT may not actually exist


yeahhh… they both look pretty real to me

The Swift F.7 was built, but didn’t have guns in real life, so that is somewhat fair.

6 Likes

same w kikka or yak-141
begleit and radkamp are also real but im too lazy to pull up some images
just google it

1 Like

It uses the same cannon as the M36B2s that were provided to japan. Those had the capability to fire HEAT-FS.

edit: In any case, gaijin has stated for a long time that ammo options are used as balancing factors; as long as a vehicle could mount or use them, it’s open to receiving them. Some have also lost certain weapons, like the F-1 which does not have the AIM-9Ls it did IRL.

1 Like

So there’s no reason to talk about any of this anymore. Gaijin will keep pushing their hypocrisy and double standards and we can do nothing about it.

I was discussing how the thing should be done so it’s done in a right way.

This introduces talks about their double standards and whatnot, which is something that definitely could be avoided. I doubt the game would end up in flames if Leopards and M1s haven’t received turret baskets before everyone else.

This could easily have been postponed, but it wasn’t.

You don’t have to devote a whole update to that, just hide vehicles in question and be done with it. I don’t think they even have plans about this topic, as not being able to find replacements for fiction that’s 5-10 years old is honestly unbelievable.

2 Likes

One prototype existed. US als had a Roland prototype on a truck.

Roland_tank_01

4 Likes

What Kh-38 model is this?

who flagged?

1 Like

38ML, easy to notice by the grid on the seeker.

2 Likes

No one said they’re fake.

@MrBombastic8
So me saying that they’re real means I didn’t do my research… Okay, prove my claim that they’re real is wrong. Go ahead.

So far evidence has exclusively proved my claim that they’re real is correct.

Oh man, I guess i need to check my glasses, as I’m seeing double!
17477758685738335419142241350392

11 Likes

Ok

You’re asking to remove quite a few vehicles which requires tree reworks, as well as multiple ammunition changes which require BR recalculation. That’s a hell of a lot of work for a point release and would be done in stages in any sane environment.

I would push back against anyone asking for that level of change in a point release. Version numbers are major.minor.patch.build and id argue that magnitude of change across multiple trees and nations would qualify for a major release. Majors are planned months in advance, I imagine gaijin know what the winter release will look like in a broad sense already, with the autumn one features pretty much nailed down already. At least, I’d hope so.

So yeah, i don’t think it’s really practical for a big bang removal like that. A commitment to removing them across several releases is much more practical and far more likely to happen.

1 Like

When was this? I know statshark used to be inaccurate due to how it handled lofting, but I do believe they’ve fixed that.

As far as I remember, it was somewhere in January-February.

ML, notice the lattice glass and large metal band. Lattice glass is used on alot of tv and SALH munitions in the former USSR and modern Russia.

1 Like

you edited ur post after hand
opinion rejected
shame on you

@MrBombastic8

Also the only thing that changed in the initial post was making it easier to read:
image

Also the fact you claim shame on me for stating a basic fact that these vehicles were real.
Pathetic.

So either agree with me or don’t; I don’t care which. Just know what you’re disagreeing to.

1 Like

I’ve requested the info from BEA archives for it, as im pretty sure they did mount the guns on the F7, they made 2 prototypes and twelve production runs to trial it, pretty sure at least one would of mounted guns, dont need 12 planes to test one form of missile.

The edit makes it mean a different thing.

The Vickers Mk.7 and FV4202 were fully complete trial vehicles, they existed in the exact state they are added to the game in. They are reflections of real vehicles.

Neither of them are unfinished prototypes, they were fully functional prototypes.

The Kikka never once had a gun fitted to it, but has it ingame, therefore it is NOT a reflection of a real life vehicle. The Kikka actually is an unfinished prototype.

1 Like

Which I do believe should be removed. as its original intended purpose was to try bomb ships, not intecept, that was a secondry throught added

ah ok thats interesting, well if they were added on the prototypes then I guess it makes more sense.