Ya my bad i was thinking of side shots and didnt mention that in that scenario.
1 Like
then you clearly didnt play the abrams much because gaijin modeled its hydraulic tank and some lines as a hydraulic pump, you would still lose both drives and engine most of the time you were penned
I don’t understand the correlation to target size/range you make. Isn’t that mostly a function of whatever optical magnification is picked, while the poor contrast resolution will just make acquiring a target in low contrast scenarios harder regardless of range?
That’s a good joke.
What are you, a RazorVon alt?
7 Likes
Who
I think hes like voldemort here
what
@RazorVon gives nothing tho, ig hes not on this forums?
Name changes are a wonder online.
Anyways, back to topic.
Kh-38MT doesn’t exist and needs to be removed.
3 Likes
Look for someone whos name has A and W.
1 Like
Thb it is getting kind of boring. Would love to see a definitive proof of one or the other.
1 Like
al, al Al-Khalid?
my name
Dang ive been found out as razor’s 3rd alt account its joever for me, how am I gonna get my 2 rubles per post now? Im gonna starve.
Man skipped over second and pinned you straight for third lol. Imagine letting someone on the forums live that much in your head rent free in this economy.
No, because as a contrast seeker Range is a function of the size of the Targeting gate that is used, which is a layer on top of the optical train.
It’s more so that you lose a lot of detail out of the imager, if a pair of identical scenes were set up, but adjusted in intensity based on know data to produce the minimal contrast scenes.
The scene where a WGU-10/B could comfortably have full spatial resolution (B/W + 6 grey steps, + target gate super-sampling) to the limits of it’s video output.
Conversely the -38MT’s seeker has no contrast at all , and so would display full black / white, or noise. As the contrast within the scene is less then the specified step function and so the returned value would be constant across the space.
In the alternate, where the same scene was to the provided specs. of the -38MT, the WGU-10/B still sees everything, but it makes no major difference (due to the image being displayed to the pilot being entirely synthetic, as having dynamic Histogram Stretching applied based upon the hotest point near / within the target gate and the the coldest point in the scene much detail is preserved)
What I’m saying is that it should be far less useful as an imager and basically just show up strange series of flat rectangular blobs, that might represent a target, nothing close to the Third gen Thermals it has arbitrarily been conferred in game.
Just look at the provided footage from the WGU-10 from Desert storm, it’s not the the WGU-10 is actually that good anyway, so relatively the -38MT should be far worse for a real scene.
9 Likes
GNDM thinks the entire forum is my alt account cause I criticize Russian equipment and make valid critiques of War Thunder.
I have only one account as per forum rules, and I reported RazerVon for being an unauthorized alt account of another when it first arrived.
GNDM thinks Russians lambasted me cause I criticize Russian equipment and War Thunder.
I’ve never defended Russia’s tech tree, only ever criticized.
1 Like
Yeah, apparently having opinions opposite of mine makes you my alt account.
@RazerVon 's opinions are majority the opposite of mine, and of course many of your opinions stated here are entirely different to mine.
All because I say “I’d like to see evidence of Kh-38MT existing or being cancelled before coming to any conclusion.”
1 Like
Out of topic.
Back to topic, where is the 38MT in VVS depot or their evaluation document?
1 Like