Lets recount the evidence of said missiles existance.
1 picture of a mockup.
1 picture of an alleged kh38mt on a su34 in a chinese brochure that we dont have access to.
What would you accept that it isn’t real?
Agm 62s are unsuable rn. Both the ones on the a4e and a7e, refuse to get a trk lock past 2.3 km
Work past that on my a4H for isreal mate
Weird, maybe its just the a7e then. The ER should be able to get a track lock with 6 kms right? Literally cannot get it to lock under over 3km
Not had that issue with any of my planes with walleyes.
However had an issue on the a7D with the gbu lock range beint about 3km
what would made it not real then?
you denied everything
if u believe that its real then get some proof
not some brochure mockups that u failed to justified why its real
Thatd the issue mate theres nothing to prove either way and neither party should rightfully change their standpoint until otherwise
yeah but 38mt is beyond balance rn
so they really need to nerf it
since they dont have any data on it either, just base it off the current brochure, with speed, drags, zoom and thermal sight generation
what would be fair is that 12x 2nd gen zoom with higher drag coefficient and remove IOG
it would still be better than any other IR agm but now more balance(would still be busted probably, but better than nothing)
also i doubt they would limit it to su-34 only, as there isnt any proof of su-30sm fielding kh-38 either, only kh-29 ive seen so far
they wont say that though, they will just give a very high price and say delivery in 3-4 years betting that they will be able to finish it in that timeframe and charge enough to open an assembly line
Generally im of the opinion of remove it.
And almost every other plane, weapon and tank that wasnt actually real e.g the f16aj
Kikka
As well as rebalance the things like that of the m26 which is artifically nerfed through both pen values and velocity
f16aj i mean sure but kikka? idk about that but i digress
never!
Your type was all lurking to rubber stamp its existence, thank god you know have a single photo of something resembling it on a plane!
Now you dont have to do anything, if only this same half baked logic applied to the A-10Cs Mavs or MMW Brimstones.
Never had its guns fitted IRL theres a possibility they may never have fitted and functioned.
Por que
alllmost 8k messages, have you guys found proof of kh’s existence yet
Not hide nor hair lf it sir
i mean that doesnt disqualified it from having guns, kikka is basically me262 but licensed with minor changes, and base on how most planes ended up it would make sense to have gun, more or less. The operational design definitely included provisions for armament, especially to function as an interceptor properly and there was no air to air missiles
same with things like cf-105, envision to have guns on production but never fitted cuz it was cut
cuz compression
and gaizin, gaizin never do decompression
Thats irrelevant to its pen being absolutely shafted.
It never fully existed as well like i said it never had guns mounted into it.
The issue is with it that it same as the KH38 cant be proven against or for bar on extemely circumstancial sources, aameas kh38mt.
Got a source for that? Most sources were destroyed before the US got to it as far as im aware.
And much like this, and yak141 they should not be in the game.
tbf i would go find it but say this, you use common sense, you dont design an aircraft with absolutely 0 arnaments, especially an interceptor in WW2, and its japan, it flown once, japan surrendered, oof the plane. The purpose of it was to strike B29, i dont think you would design an early jet to banzai into the bomber
why shouldnt the cf-105 be ingame
yak 141 did fly and did have gun installed, however weapon capability was never tested, but given Gaizin do things, id let it pass, since how would u balance things like that and most prototype vehicle usually land in a difficult spot between not added and not balanced properly