Having 115 deaths in 155 battles doesn’t seem to be aggressive, especially considering the vehicle you’re operating and it’s capabilities.
I just stated they outrange every AA at their BR, which is correct.
By the way, A-10A at 10.3 doesn’t have 65Ds.
you know that was removed because it would be way to easy to grind in air sim right?
it had nothing to do with ground
Still tho if they remove the kh38 might aswell re add the grom 1
Should I point out the fact that the A-10 Doesn’t have access to large caliber (or HE) rockets, APHE rounds for its gun (that 8mm HE action really isn’t doing much of anything to most targets outside those with the lightest of armor schema, and the APCR has very poor Angled performance) or access to SALH missiles. All of which make the SU-25 better at actually killing targets without using Standoff ordnance.
I also see the argument made all the time that the Typhoon is better than everything else because of “sustained CAS”.
Well, the Su-39 at 11.3 has 16x Vikhrs the A-10C at 12.0 has 6x AGM-65Ds without a tpod.
Only in worlds where air defenses aren’t present. In the real world standing off and attacking with mavericks is significantly more reliably than diving into the danger zone with the Su-25k’s kit.c
has anything changed that would make it less insane for air sim?
because if not why would they add it back
Maybe remove it for sim if they really need to? keep it for ground?
they have never restricted a weapon like that before, why would they do it now?
They might eventually add the Strategic class SAMs to defend the base targets that might shoot down incoming ordnance, so it might become a possible addition in future if they go that way.
It’s just likely to be a few Update in the future before they get around to revising them.
Neither the A-10 or Su-25 would be diving into the danger zone before SEAD took place…
well… not in a competent military any way.
Because, it could make a bigger impact on the outcome of the match, since it has so many ammunitions, it can stay in the air for longer and having better combat endurance greatly increases the number of potential kills.
Though of course fnf ammununitions can also hardly influence the outcome of a match.
If they could do that. Then we should have FnF Brimstones for ASB
Then again, I point out the Su-39 is a lower BR than the A-10C.
Well i don’t know about that
16x AGMs vs 6x AGMs.
But aint one laser guided and the other tv?
Yes.
And the Typhoon has 18x laser guided and the Su-30SM has 6x IIR+IOG AGMs but apparently the Typhoon is superior to the Su-30 because it has more AGMs.
But this doesnt apply to the SU-39 vs A-10C
As always skipping the other “unimportant” stuff like A-10C has HMD, 4 irccm smokeless missiles and they are both subsonic platforms
Skipping what exactly?
A2A performance for Ground attackers doesnt really become much of a factor. Otherwise the Av-8B+ and Harrier Gr7 should be at different BRs because one has 4x Aim-9m and the other has 2-4 Aim-9M and 2-4 Aim-120A.
And the SU-39 has IRCCM
and the Su-39 has IRCM which is one of the few guaranteed defences against any IR SAM, if used right.
They are largely equal airframes, and yet they have radically different A2G performances and yet the A-10C is for some reason higher. Heck, it is the same BR as the Harrier Gr7 that dunks on it all day long in terms of A2A combat and probably A2G as well.