Mega kill farmer that achieved 1.1 K/D in his HVM.
russia cas missiles at 10.3 isn’t even as good as american cas at that br? the zoom on the su25k to even do decent missile cas is horrible
Congrats?
That would be because Im quite aggressive with the Stormer HVM to exploit its LT/SPAA killing potential and its scouting ability rather than camping in spawn AFK. Also minimises its weakness of having only 6km range missiles when dealing with CAS.
(and quite frankly the fact I am positive in it, shows thats the Stormer HVM can fight back just fine)
But my KD proves absolutely nothing in regard to the fact that I have never once had an issue with being outranged by an A-10 with their “AGM-65s”. I rarely even see them fire past about 6km anyway because of the poor quality of the seekers.
and as you ALWAYS like to point out, if they were really that OP the A-10 would be a higher BR and the A-10A wouldnt be 10.3. You really need to consider the whole aircraft and not just the AGM-65s
4 Likes
It all comes down to whether or not the pilot is good and leverages their standoff weapons, in which case the A-10 blows the Su-25 out of the water, or if it’s the average american main who comes in for a BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRT run. In the later case he’s a free kill.
Having 115 deaths in 155 battles doesn’t seem to be aggressive, especially considering the vehicle you’re operating and it’s capabilities.
I just stated they outrange every AA at their BR, which is correct.
By the way, A-10A at 10.3 doesn’t have 65Ds.
you know that was removed because it would be way to easy to grind in air sim right?
it had nothing to do with ground
Still tho if they remove the kh38 might aswell re add the grom 1
Should I point out the fact that the A-10 Doesn’t have access to large caliber (or HE) rockets, APHE rounds for its gun (that 8mm HE action really isn’t doing much of anything to most targets outside those with the lightest of armor schema, and the APCR has very poor Angled performance) or access to SALH missiles. All of which make the SU-25 better at actually killing targets without using Standoff ordnance.
8 Likes
I also see the argument made all the time that the Typhoon is better than everything else because of “sustained CAS”.
Well, the Su-39 at 11.3 has 16x Vikhrs the A-10C at 12.0 has 6x AGM-65Ds without a tpod.
Only in worlds where air defenses aren’t present. In the real world standing off and attacking with mavericks is significantly more reliably than diving into the danger zone with the Su-25k’s kit.c
1 Like
has anything changed that would make it less insane for air sim?
because if not why would they add it back
Maybe remove it for sim if they really need to? keep it for ground?
they have never restricted a weapon like that before, why would they do it now?
They might eventually add the Strategic class SAMs to defend the base targets that might shoot down incoming ordnance, so it might become a possible addition in future if they go that way.
It’s just likely to be a few Update in the future before they get around to revising them.
Neither the A-10 or Su-25 would be diving into the danger zone before SEAD took place…
well… not in a competent military any way.
1 Like
Because, it could make a bigger impact on the outcome of the match, since it has so many ammunitions, it can stay in the air for longer and having better combat endurance greatly increases the number of potential kills.
Though of course fnf ammununitions can also hardly influence the outcome of a match.
If they could do that. Then we should have FnF Brimstones for ASB
Then again, I point out the Su-39 is a lower BR than the A-10C.
1 Like
Well i don’t know about that
16x AGMs vs 6x AGMs.