For example in a long range say 70km shot with SALH variant (which also implies illumination by another air or ground based platform), without GNSS the INS might drift enough that when the missile reaches the seeker range the seeker might not even be pointing in the right direction to look for the laser pointer …
Also in general, in case of losing the target in the terminal phase, you would have to rely on the INS, and having GNSS to correct for INS drift would improve your accuracy …
The new evidence of the brochure from the Zhuhai airshow in 2024 is honestly a very solid point in favor of at least it existing in an operational way unfortunately.
I never proved the missile did not exist. The evidence against its existence up until the Zhuhai brochure was posted was pretty strong imo, but if the Zhuhai brochure is real, think the missile is atleast to the point of being a prototype weapon.
That being said, I do have some doubts about the Zhuhai brochure.
Its super weird its in english. Theres not really any reasons for it to be I’d think, seeing as its a chinese airshow, and its a russian weapon not being marketted to english speaking nations.
The image of the missile mounted on the jet is kinda weird.
Not sure what JSC “TMC” is, afaik the manufacturer is supposed to be KTRV
There are also some other oddities;
If there really are pictures of the Kh-38MT as seen on the brochure, why have they never been used before
Why remove the Kh-38MTE from the most up to date version of the ROE website if the missile is still being advertised
Is the brochure really from Zhuhai 2024 (theres no supporting evidence of this)
That being said, I cant really conclusively disprove the brochure, there’s just stuff that bug me about it, so as of now, I sit on the fence. I’ve updated the threads original post to reflect the new info.