They outright do not exist at all
Yo I found the source for the seeker
ts how people be acting
15 Likes
See, I see a picture of this weapon, therefore its 100% real and should be added to everything. ASRAAM exists and has been fired and this is just ASRAAM with some slight tweaks :P
2 Likes
It came to me in a dream
2 Likes
Not true. All of them have their chassis and various other portions built, just not all implemented together or completely.
Yeah because they probably wouldnt have worked. Wasn’t there not enough space for the Tiger 105 to work?
The source that i’ve made.
Is the standard “could it work?”
Rangefinder clipped into breach, Gun recoil turned loaders into paste.
1 Like
I dont know, I’d have to discuss that with a tech mod. As ppl have said, its effectively impossible to definitively proove something does not exist, so I’m still waiting for someone to post actual evidence the thing does exist.
Imo, the current qvailable info doesnt surpass the threshold of the Flakpanzer 341 Coelian which was removed from the game due to only being a mockup. Couple that with the balanfe issues and id assume any reasonable dev team would remove it ASAP, but this is gaijin we’re talking about so I think the odds are stacked against it being removed.
I’d like if some mods, particularly tech mods, would provide input on how i should handle the situation going forward.
Alternatively, an official reply from the devs/smin would be helpful.
8 Likes
Yeah, it was basically a YF-16 with stuff to use sparrows. The US one would have a different radar to the F-16AJ though
1 Like
Its lowkey annoying lol.
I feel like I’m being more than fair with the potential of its existence, I’m discussing any arguments in good faith, Ive LITERALLY made the thread to try to find info that it does in fact exist, and yet ppl are attacking me over it and just making random bs claims. :/
Not once have I said it for sure doesnt exist, just that I cant find any info up to the games standard and that if someone else has relevant additional info, that I’d like to see it. Pretty sure thats super reasonable.
4 Likes
It have LOBL.
1 Like
Wdym, it’s a true argument
I am asking you if the standard for implementing vehicles/munitions in the game is whether it is physically possible for those machines to have existed.
Wait, so YF-16 couldn’t use sparrows?
In other words: We can build a 4002020 ton tank, so lets add it into the game since its possible.
1 Like
From what i can tell the company created the “shell” but no info on the seeker in the front though which was the one i was referring to in that conversation. (funnily enough though the mockup-company titles it as MTE but writes “inertial + semi-active laser” as guidance lol)
2 Likes
At base it couldn’t, but it was modified to be able to use them, additionally gaining landing gear door pylons for them to be mounted on. On this test all 8 pylons could be used for mounting sparrows. However no more then 2 on a wing at a time, i believe due to structural reasons, for a theortical total of 6x sparrows and 2x sidewinders, a much much better loadout then the F-16AJ gets in game of 2 sparrows 4 sidewinders, and one i really wish they’d add for it.
1 Like
I am not saying that that should be the standard. He says that the Tiger II 10,5 wouldn’t have worked (based on what, Idk), so it should not be added. I am asking him if it could be made to work, then should it be implemented?
From my point of view, it doesn’t matter whether you have to fully reconstruct a turret/breach or make an imaginary seeker-head.