BT-42, BT-5, M-22, 15cm SIG, and Ha-Go’s.
It can be done well. I think that FnF munitions should be a middle-ground between laser-guided munitions and nukes- with an SP cost of like 1500 sp.
Ka-Chi too cant forget the funny boat
It’d be lots of fun. Probably not for people who like MiG-29s and Su-27s tho.
Everyone is getting of track now, please stay on topic.
That’s the thing, it isn’t just the Kh-38MTs that are over-performing, it’s also the SBU 64 AASM 250.
This discussion has shed light on two weapons, not just one.
And I’d like to see the direct-lock on feature of both missiles disabled instead of weapons removed.
Cause that way they’re still in the game, and worst case is that they’re useless until the way they’re supposed to function is added to the game.
Pantsir kinda negates the NATO variants, meanwhile Russia don’t got any enemy Pantsirs. The other missiles are performing, but the rushian one is super duper performing.
KH38MT is overperforming more than anything you’ve mentioned.
What is your source though? (For Kh-38MT)
The KH38T is both unbalanced and possibly not real - The best solution is to remove it and (if possible) replace it with a more balanced real life weapon
Did anyone find information about the seeker?
Or if we really want to get our hands dirty, start giving NATO prototype weapons and mock ups that are unbalanced and possibly not real as well.
It’s earlier in the topic. I’m busy to re-search the topic for you.
And no @_Ladies_Man_217 and @French_Cat2 that’s not what over-performing means.
Over-performing means compared to the real-life weapon, in this case the seeker.
It doesn’t mean in comparison to other in-game weapons.
Naw, there is NONE. Zero. Abyssal. Non-existent. Unknown.
They need to rework them I think or bring the other kit’s to of same calibur + decompress the top tier cas BR
Then be more specific next time!
Roger. Will do.
They can take any reports and documents from this thread and create a bug report, if they get rejected by simply saying “We dont intend to neither nerf nor balance the missile” then its 10000% double-standards and they favor Russia.
Or you just made something up …
You somehow have time to repeatedly make this claim, but no time to actually substantiate it …
It literally is a mockup, I even provided the link to the company that built it.
Its not, I updated the original post with the link to the company that produced the mockup.