The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

Give this to the USSR (from Ukraine) and to China (from Taiwan) ☠️☠️☠️

great more whataboutism
we didnt had enough of that in this thread already

oh idk, maybe its the sheer speed and explosive mass and range that literally doesnt let any SPAA have a chance to counter?

im sure the Su-25SM3 can do well albiet within 20km if the 38 is replaced with the 25

I see you can’t face facts, after the leaklist drop and its definitely what i said earlier i’m going to mention you to confirm the double standards Gaijin do when its about Russia.

what leak list?

the fake one that got deleted from the WT subreddit a few hours later?

@MotorolaCRO

to summarise
the Kh-38 is OP because of the speed, the range, the IOG and the explosive mass.
the Kh-25MT/P would be balanced because it has 20km range, no IOG but still a decent explosive mass as well as decent speed.
it is comparable to other Anti tank IR AGMs

idk the source of this but here ya go

image

I said after the leak drop, not the one that’s fake.

if that was what you tried to express iam sorry, but for that you should have used the past tense of drop
instead of the present tense

Why would i use the past tense if the leaklist going to drop in the future?

Not a single marking + no seeker.

Spoiler


Nothing pointing at it being MT - no markings. Seeker is anything but IR. I bet it’s an early version of some other variant, perhaps laser one. Three weird thingies may point at some triangulation algorithm etc. Photo is dated 2015 or earlier.
Propaganda site link
Article doesn’t even mention what that is. So probably just a mockup scrambled for opening ceremony.
Looks like garbage as well. Surface of American dumb bombs is finer than that.
Now I’ll be looking into this chinese brochure.

there isnt any pic of su30 mounting kh38 afaik

Look at US ramjet missile mockup on F-14, it had safety stuff on it. So mockups have had safety equipment

1 Like

HAHAHAH WHAT? SM3 is much better than A10C even without kh38s. I hate to say it but thats just pure skill issue lmaaaao

1 Like

if Su-25 is a brick then A-10 is probably a whole ass brick wall

3 Likes

I mean a10c is very good imo. Its not that of a brick. It can defend very well. Its just gayjin that gave it weapons that are broken and hard to use which made me and other 0.01% people that use it to play well

ye people think its good but once the ahistorical HMD slaved 9Ms feature is removed, its just another A-10 with a bit more variety

In the brochure the missile on the left is most certainly ML. What for the missile on the right? Well…
image
Seeker window is pretty much similar to the ML one so. I also think that some kind of AI upscaling is involved there.
Anyways it’s not the MT though, it’s MTE - supposedly a better version. The one in the game is MT.

I m talking about a2g role. Even tho this confirms that gayjin doesnt bother about vehs that are utterly broken

I would take ccip fix any day of the weak in price of removing HMS

1 Like

just limit 38mt to su34 and maybe su25sm3 only
make it from 6x to 4x 38mt
seeker down to 15x and gen 2
speed decrease maybe

You wouldn’t believe it even if it got delivered to your living room lmao.