If that ring was an reflection it would be visible on the one side only.
2 Likes
It does.
Also what the red circles even are supposed to be proof of? It’s the mountingpoint that both missiles have.
2 Likes
and typhoon doesnt get fnf armament. Russia still could get Tv missles etc.
Its fair that russia gets an imaginerary missle but typhoon isnt allowed to get an fnf missle
definitly seems fair
2 Likes
idc about typhoon. And this is not the Thread for that.
I mean, the EF2000 still is banging, you can lock the laser on and go 3rd person, like wtih GBU’s however the KH38MT should be removed until we get some confirmation of its existence.
The KH29T would do fine on the su30 for example
1 Like
i think RU strategy is
they are advertising it to china
China buy RU = more money
more money = more development on missiles
missiles done = finally IR ordinance
profit and sucess
its a comparison to similar situations.
Your whole statement just is useless and untrue. its nothing fair about it or sth that needs to be fullfilled
oh hey gun job since u are here can u check the above
If they were really that desperate to ask for funding for an IR seeker, they would probably give out information on what they’re wanting to build and with what performance, to entice supporters.
Seeing how vaguely mentioned the IR part is, I think it’s already incorporated to the missile.
Look where the circle is and the top bar or whatever it is. You can see exactly where the circle is.
1 Like
im pretty sure that part wont be on the brochure
So first give me your money and only then I’ll tell you about the important thing.
I don’t think that’s how funding works.
2 Likes
there is absolutely nothing there man that’s straight up just cope if you ask me specially because there is setoffs on the bottom and top of the missile wich start where the rail on top starts wich on the ML picture it dosent have and neither does the MT mockup
In some cases in teh past it has actually, the advertise it being able to do X. and Y but can only do Y or X , usually ends up with both models thouhg unless one of them is just out and out better than the other.
I have nothing to cope with. I was against the Kh-38MT from the very beginning. It looks more like you’re coping.
they arent even KH38’s the setoffs and shape arent even that of a KH 38
2 Likes
1 Like
You know what a ridge or rim is, right? There is literally nothing there for the MT to be casting a dark shadow. Look closely at the one on the right, the seeker is actually angled downwards, and it’s not casting any reflections or shadows, which is more like the MT seeker would look like under sunlight.
But both could be something entirely different, or maybe both are the ML, the resolution, angle and exposure is so bad that at the end of the day nothing can be derived from it.
2 Likes