It’s impossible to make all happy.
30SM could live with those, no problem with that.
On SU-34 I’m not really for that happening as already explained. It’s like going from a high refresh rate monitor back to 60Hz one.
Absolutely gutting moment.
They can but firing with point lock instead of track lock is always risky, especially if you have like four missiles in total.
There’s plenty of planes at 11.3 - 11.7, I don’t think we need another one to join the gang.
| Vehicle | Ground Kills | Deaths |
|---|---|---|
| Su-30SM | 21 | 5 |
| MQ-1 | 6 | 9 |
| ◄EF-2000 | 7 | 7 |
| F-20A | 5 | 6 |
| Su-34 | 9 | 2 |
| Su-39 | 7 | 3 |
| F-15E | 3 | 5 |
| Su-24M | 6 | 2 |
| F-2000A | 7 | 1 |
| Rafale C | 4 | 2 |
| F-16C | 2 | 2 |
| F/A-18C Early | 3 | 1 |
| ◄Tornado IDS | 2 | 2 |
| MiG-29SMT | 3 | 1 |
| Su-25T | 2 | 2 |
| ▄F-5T | 3 | 1 |
| ◔JAS39C | 4 | 0 |
| ␗F-16A | 3 | 1 |
| JAS39C | 2 | 2 |
| AV-8B | 2 | 1 |
| Su-25 | 2 | 1 |
| MiG-27M | 2 | 1 |
| ▄F-5E | 3 | 0 |
| F-14B | 2 | 0 |
Brother brought nuclear bomb to a toothpick fight.
Happy 7k posts everyone. How’s it going? Any developments? This scrap is still as fake as it was before?
‘Fraid so.
Still zero evidence it has ever existed, and zero response from gaijin.
You got proof of that ? Being my replays.
That it is GRB exclusively ?
Also i died more to ef2000s than su30s.
kh-38MTE via weibo（微博）@DPRK425 This image is from the Russian military export advertising brochure obtained by the blogger at the Zhuhai Airshow.
bro got caught in 4K
almost missed the milestone that is 7000 posts in this topic
i guess we dont really have anything new? apart from that brochure from above
hmm i mean it is installed on an aircraft
but
idk if its mockups or actual missiles
i mean MTE is export model after all
What’s the issue with that ?
because its a brochure and on the picture of the aircraft i see what looks like rope that is tied onto the hardpoint rail
so the authenticity is ? but then im not sure
and its still a brochure anyway
so thermal generation, zoom lenses, capability is still unknown
hardly, its not a very balanced metric to go by.
Having watched them all , theres a massive distinction.
So in almost every single game theres a SU30 in it.
However, there is substantially less games with EF2000 or the other platforms within them.
To boot, these platforms did more in the games they were in.
Prime examples being EF2000, however as the 2 models in the F2000A and EF2000 scored 14 kills and each one only shows up once, the F2000 in one game and the Ef2000 if I recall correctly inanother couple.
EDIT: Meant to say the F2000A shows up once and the EF2000 twice, or three times.
in 2 games they score over half the kills of the su30 out of 22-
So yeah the su30 aint all that and it is not rinsing entire lobbies like folks claim
Statistically speaking, the su30 has scored almost a 1 kill per match, “if not a bit less” as its 21 kills.
However, this doesn’t change my opinion of hte KH38MT should still be removed.
EDIT: @RoyallCSGO Can you also, you know, not stalk my acc xD watching at least 22 of my replies is extremely strange and off putting.
Isn’t this technically evidence of it existing ?
Those ropes are actually straps that the crew probably used to lift the missile into the mounting racks. But yeah, seeker capabilities are still unknown. That brochure is still a great find, however, but we have to verify whether it’s real or not.
Looks more like an MLE (the picture that’s shown on the Su-34). Seeker points forwards, and if my eyes don’t deceive me, it has the same silver “outline” next to the seeker, which the MLE is shown to have. Would also make sense as the ML is known to be used, which the same cannot be said to the MT/MTE
This is from the same guy who posted this. In the end that is just my view.
i mean
it looks close
but im still not sure
Which is why IR seekers in the game work in the same way.
@An_Pigeon
Maybe, if they don’t give out export brochures for not yet built stuff which might them years to finish.
maybe not for 38MT(IOG)
RU is known to try sell export unfinished model (su-57, but that thing flown already)
38MT domestic is unknown, so 38MTE export is unlikely but then there isnt anything new
IR seekers work the same, but that cannot be said for zoom and thermal generation, which is not known on the X-38MTE. For all we know it could be a fixed zoom with a narrow field of view like on the LMUR missile.
