The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

38mt kill plane better than 9B

It is a reskinned, copy-pasted Block 10 with sparrows. There is nothing “fake” about the AJ’s capabilities and it’s missing the one thing that made japan even consider it:

17451338921982437896023572646561

So while its addition is wrong as it was never built, everything written on the brochure had already been built and tested.

This cannot be said for the Kh-38MT and so it is somehow EVEN MORE FAKE than the F-16AJ.

7 Likes

wrong the rocket motor of the KH-38 exists the only thing that dosent is the seeker
(similar to the E-100, the hull existed but the turret for it didnt)

and also the f-16aj dosent even look close to the one that was presented (mainly the nose)
and they shouldnt have gotten a f-16a blk 10 but a YF-16 with sparrows instead

The fact that brochure for 38MT is just a mockup tells you sth
i mean they got some fair point japan never really use the AJ but its based of a real plane and real capability that japan is interested in
but its gaijin fault for adding a plane that japan does not officially use and are basically tech demo plane that they copy paste because “muh F-2 not finnish”

yes which is why 38mt is totally gaijin crap on its capability
they just put whatever best they can put
= russian bias

russian bias is a strawman argument made by bad players to justify their skill issue

by that logic the E-100 is German Bias and the F-16AJ Japanese bias

3 Likes

That’s literally less parts completed than the F-16AJ. Everything in the F-16AJ brochure had been made and tested already; nobody is disputing the Kh-38MT has no seeker and thus CANNOT function at all and can’t be put together.

That’s my point, while the F-16AJ is a “fake plane” it is STILL more real than the Kh-38MT just by virtue of all the parts needed to make one already existing.

3 Likes

i got the T80UK and ill tell u its pure suffer but sometimes the autoloader ate sum shii or bias armor

except that 38MT capability is unknown and never known and are unrealistic and stupidly OP when E-100 turret is fake and unfinished
and F-16AJ is just gaijin lazy
also you have to realize that slapping IR IOG on an existing platform isnt easy

Let me know when the F-16AJ flies twice as fast as other F-16s lol

3 Likes

When i started playing War Thunder, i chose Russia for my first nation because i thought there is Russian Bias for sure.
Glad i did, because i learned it doesn’t exist.

1 Like

There’s also nothing fake about an American Rafale’s capabilities but it’s still non-existent

2 Likes

That’s a massive accomplishment.

Not what I claimed.

Edit: also irrelevant since there is no american Rafale in the game.

1 Like

Yes, MT is faker than AJ but not by much since both differ from what was planned

And I’m using American Rafale as a similar example as AJ, it’s just that Japan and Russia get special treatment for things that don’t exist

We don’t even know how good the 38MT’s seeker is supposed to be, on top of it not existing. And as I said above:

1 Like

Well yeah that’s what I mean by differ from what was planned, no way MT seeker is that good. And also you said yourself AJ in-game is not even same as AJ in paper brochure

Both are pretty close in fakeness but MT slightly more because of seeker

The fake part is the fact it’s under Japan which it never was.

Bias is the fact they received something that was never theirs. At this point just add Rafale to China, they deserve it.

1 Like

Man… I played both f15e and f18 on grb and for me f18 is much better just cuz its much more manouverable. It bleeds speed just like su30 but it also wont get into such high speeds as su30 tho.

F15e is quite a brick for grb. Maps are just too small for it

I did, and I’m not wrong. It’s missing GBU-8s and another two Sparrows at least. But even then it has no fictional capabilities.

No, 38MT is much more fake than F-16AJ. Without much effort, back then, an “F-16AJ” could have been assembled, painted, and delivered to japan, as per the brochure or even the in-game implementation.

The Kh-38MT is missing the one thing that differentiates it from the ML.

Again, not what I’m claiming.

Hardly biased when it’s no better than other nations’ F-16s and a SIGNIFICANT downgrade from the plane they should have received:

7 Likes

That’s like giving Rafale to China and saying it’s not bias because it’s a copy paste of the French one.

Japan as a nation in the game got it’s abilities and performances altered by using something it was never theirs.