Just scrolling down and seeing your posts is painful enough, give him some slack.
Second is a fact by Gaijin’s own statements, bug report rejection reasons and just plain common sense.
12 Likes
Remove those missiles.
2 Likes
Didn’t expect much from RU main who only fly Russians ofc he gonna protected his skill less fake missile pressing spacebar for few times out side spaa range is all they do after all.
4 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
The Su27sm we have ingame should have 2 extra wing pylons instead of the double pylons.
Only the Su27sm3 got the upgraded engine, that we have ingame rn and the Su27sm3 has the 2 extra wing pylons like the su30 or su33 for example.
In the end it wouldn’t make a difference tho if the double pylons are removed and the extra wing pylons are added
1 Like
then report it on the issues site, if the document you are quoting is good enough to not be considered secondary source at best, it will get changed.
because it was deemed to op, you really need those longbows now? or do you want just another way to bully tanks and spaa alike
dont have the f111 but:
i would assume its a irl limitation.
serverside issue, desync and all, if you think its bad code or “fantasy land” instead of a bad servers, go to heli pve around 8.3 and try hit a convoy vehicle, the server loves to desync stuff
then report it on the issues site, if the document you are quoting is good enough to not be considered secondary source at best, it will get changed.
never had that happen to me, weird because i usually play around those br’s nowadays.
because most of them are designed to stop chemical weaponary, and to counter that type of armour you only need tandem charge on a missile for example.
–
also i fail to see what you meant by “do yourself a favor and stop researching how bad some of the models are gimped”. You might have responded to the wrong comment lol, i was responding to a person asking if we cant find a proof of existance/non-existance of the KH-38MT.
and also, remember, its just a game, nothing serious, not a simulator or anything, just a silly game for people who wanna play their favourite vehicle.
(also if you have something to say to me, just dm me, i dont want to talk about off-topic things on this thread)
Spike, Vikhr, Pars: exists…
4 Likes
spike and pars are f&f yes, but pars has like 3.7 kg of explosive and hellfires have around 9 kg, makes them way more lethal against armoured targets, longbows would be way better then spike or pars
and when it comes to vikhr’s, yeah those are op, what can i tell you, do you want more powercreep as a answer to existing powercreep?
also if anybody wants to talk about this to me, just dm me, im done answering off topic stuff here
It is not.
1 Like
yeah, sure its not.
That does not prove the F-111 cannot sweep the wings with the moving internal pylons loaded with a pair of gunpods. It proves the external fixed pylons can be jettisoned, which is another limitation artificially imposed on the F-111 series by Gaijin.
2 Likes
balans
at this point just give us sm3
“…The fixed pylons are streamlined at 26 degrees wing sweep angle only. A fixed stores lockout in the wing sweep handle prevents weeping the wings more than 26 degrees with fixed pylons installed…”
“…A weapons lockout in the wing sweep handle prevents sweeping the wings more than 55 degrees with certain weapons loaded on the inboard pivoting pylons to prevent damage to the fuselage. …”
1 Like
I much rather would have an accurate sm3 as well but iam just saying that it won’t change a thing in the grand scheme
Blockquote why advertise it for export if you didnt even buid/ test it
Well Su-75 checkmate is an example, never flown, but they tried to export it.
1 Like
Lol im afraid there wont be any nerfs for a while, sowwy :3
1 Like
THink he might have meant su75 but that thing could have flied by now.
2 Likes
there is an accepted report that has been sitting for years they dont want to fix it
1 Like