The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

[LeMemeAesthetic]

They’re also ignoring the fact that, to bring a higher quantity of ordinance to battle than the Su-30SM for example, the other jets need to sacrifice a significant portion of their air to air ordinance.

That’s something of a tautology, no? Few planes can carry a full load of AAM’s and air to ground weapons at the same time. Most of my CAS loadouts take the maximum number of useful CAS weapons the plane can carry, and then as many AAM’s as can be carried without impinging on that. The sample Su-34 and F-15E loadouts I mentioned earlier were based on the presets I actually use.

This is also ignoring the fact that the time on station to use additional laser guided PGM’s renders their carriage effectively worthless when compared to standoff munitions like Kh-38MT and AASM IR.

You’ll notice I mentioned GBU-31’s and not GBU-24’s, as I agree that LGB’s are not terribly useful at top tier these days (I haven’t even bothered unlocking the GBU-24 on the Rafale yet). GNSS weapons are a different story.

[MotorolaCRO]

@S-200VE_Vega

still no official gaijin reply?

@S-200VE_Vega

better to ask here and read a reply in 20sec rather than scroll through 750 useless replies
complain about it if you want to i have better things to do tonight, wont lose sleep over it.

You know you could’ve used the search tool and find all (if any) posts from Stona or Smin in this thread ?
It would probably take less time than writing all this and you’ll get first hand information.

[ShOt_MaCkEr]

Just scrolling down and seeing your posts is painful enough, give him some slack.

Missile is fake and it’s addition is unjust.

First is a fact by lack of evidence from anyone or anything which makes it a fact due to scientific method being applicable to this situation. It’s a hardware discussion, we’re not discussing ideas here, nothing theoretical or philosophical is being brought up. Stop trying to stab an empty bush.

Second is a fact by Gaijin’s own statements, bug report rejection reasons and just plain common sense.
Wanna discuss my stance on common sense? Scroll up and read.

[_Jackal]

Remove those missiles.

[ARK_BOI]

Didn’t expect much from RU main who only fly Russians ofc he gonna protected his skill less fake missile pressing spacebar for few times out side spaa range is all they do after all.

[MotorolaCRO]

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

[ron_23]

@MythicPi

They were initially added to the Su-27SM to help it out since it had inferior AAM’s, so they wanted to give it more of them to somewhat counteract this issue.

The Su27sm we have ingame should have 2 extra wing pylons instead of the double pylons.

Only the Su27sm3 got the upgraded engine, that we have ingame rn and the Su27sm3 has the 2 extra wing pylons like the su30 or su33 for example.

In the end it wouldn’t make a difference tho if the double pylons are removed and the extra wing pylons are added

[Sakyuz]

@SoundWave777

F15’s break apart at half their max airspeed for sea level at 4000 meters

then report it on the issues site, if the document you are quoting is good enough to not be considered secondary source at best, it will get changed.

@SoundWave777

AH64D Longbow isn’t allowed Longbows and fails to track 128 targets simultaneously and engauge 16.

because it was deemed to op, you really need those longbows now? or do you want just another way to bully tanks and spaa alike

@SoundWave777

F-111A fails to sweep wings to 45 degrees with gunpods on.

dont have the f111 but:

i would assume its a irl limitation.

@SoundWave777

Starstreaks are basically sabotaged and phase straight through jets.

serverside issue, desync and all, if you think its bad code or “fantasy land” instead of a bad servers, go to heli pve around 8.3 and try hit a convoy vehicle, the server loves to desync stuff

@SoundWave777

Abrams turret rings missing 150mm of protection.

then report it on the issues site, if the document you are quoting is good enough to not be considered secondary source at best, it will get changed.

@SoundWave777

Over tuned Spall liners that stop APFSDS when they should only stop spall.

never had that happen to me, weird because i usually play around those br’s nowadays.

@SoundWave777

Western ERA that does nothing.

because most of them are designed to stop chemical weaponary, and to counter that type of armour you only need tandem charge on a missile for example.

–
also i fail to see what you meant by “do yourself a favor and stop researching how bad some of the models are gimped”. You might have responded to the wrong comment lol, i was responding to a person asking if we cant find a proof of existance/non-existance of the KH-38MT.

and also, remember, its just a game, nothing serious, not a simulator or anything, just a silly game for people who wanna play their favourite vehicle.
(also if you have something to say to me, just dm me, i dont want to talk about off-topic things on this thread)

[kitsune_qq]

@Sakyuz

because it was deemed to op, you really need those longbows now? or do you want just another way to bully tanks and spaa alike

Spike, Vikhr, Pars: exists…

[Sakyuz]

@kitsune_qq

Spike, Vikhr, Pars: exists…

spike and pars are f&f yes, but pars has like 3.7 kg of explosive and hellfires have around 9 kg, makes them way more lethal against armoured targets, longbows would be way better then spike or pars

and when it comes to vikhr’s, yeah those are op, what can i tell you, do you want more powercreep as a answer to existing powercreep?

also if anybody wants to talk about this to me, just dm me, im done answering off topic stuff here

[BeautifulTai_wan]

@Sakyuz

i would assume its a irl limitation.

It is not.

[Sakyuz]

yeah, sure its not.

[BeautifulTai_wan]

That does not prove the F-111 cannot sweep the wings with the moving internal pylons loaded with a pair of gunpods. It proves the external fixed pylons can be jettisoned, which is another limitation artificially imposed on the F-111 series by Gaijin.

[Zannafrancy12]

balans

[Zannafrancy12]

at this point just give us sm3

[Sakyuz]

@BeautifulTai_wan

That does not prove the F-111 cannot sweep the wings with the moving internal pylons loaded with a pair of gunpods

“…The fixed pylons are streamlined at 26 degrees wing sweep angle only. A fixed stores lockout in the wing sweep handle prevents weeping the wings more than 26 degrees with fixed pylons installed…”

“…A weapons lockout in the wing sweep handle prevents sweeping the wings more than 55 degrees with certain weapons loaded on the inboard pivoting pylons to prevent damage to the fuselage. …”

[ron_23]

I much rather would have an accurate sm3 as well but iam just saying that it won’t change a thing in the grand scheme

[_pixy]

Blockquote why advertise it for export if you didnt even buid/ test it

Well Su-75 checkmate is an example, never flown, but they tried to export it.

[rezhin44]

Lol im afraid there wont be any nerfs for a while, sowwy :3

[ron_23]

the su57 is very much able to fly