Agreed, but unfortunately that’s what you need to do to have something removed.
Had people pointed this out a year ago when the Su-25SM3 was on the dev server, I think Gaijin would have removed the missile. However, now that it’s on the live server on 3 different planes, and Gaijin has added more powerful CAS weapons to other nations (the AASM in particular), and is planning to add more powerful SAM’s across the board, it seems hard to imagine them removing it.
They also added Brimstones and SBD’s, which most don’t think are as strong as AASM’s or Kh-38MT’s, but Gaijin probably thought of them as somewhat analogous regardless.
And to echo another comment, I also suspect more powerful CAS weapons to come fairly soon. I could see them adding an IR Brimstone as well as Stormbreaker, likely in limited numbers though.
Just to see, I also tested what roughly the terminal velocity is of the Mav in a free fall.
Spoiler
Not sure if this is a testament to how draggy the maverick is, or that bombs are too low drag, or just realistic. Anyway, it’s pretty draggy. Not sure if the mav would’ve gone even lower if given more time, considering it did have the benefit of banking off the extra speed from the engine. I like how the JDAM wasn’t even that much slower than the Mav for the distance traveled.
EDIT: The heavier (by about 70kg) 65G seems to be able to hold mach 1 though, just, despite being a bit heavier than the GBU-38. Though drag wise it makes sense, the blunt nose (for the IR seeker) is inherently going to be more draggy than than the nose of the JDAM.
So it’s pretty draggy currently. But mind you, the mav even correctly modelled to irl performance will probably not be amazing still. Well, at least don’t expect it to match the Kh-38 at all probably not even Kh-29. It will be better, but it won’t magically solve all the issues people point out with the Maverick.
Spoiler
Anyone happen to live in Washington btw? Near the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum? They apparently in the archives there have a document about the TX-633 engine (smokeless engine used on AGM-65D/G, etc, should have same performance as the earlier mav engine as well. Could be helpful information to complement my Mav bug report.
better to ask here and read a reply in 20sec rather than scroll through 750 useless replies
complain about it if you want to i have better things to do tonight, wont lose sleep over it.