Who said that ?
Once again, vehicles are entities that are getting balanced, not weaponry.
@An_Pigeon
If that was a trial, then it was a pretty shitty one as it was heavily limited.
Who said that ?
Once again, vehicles are entities that are getting balanced, not weaponry.
@An_Pigeon
If that was a trial, then it was a pretty shitty one as it was heavily limited.
And, oh wonder, its job in squadronbattles is to take out the Pantsir, which it is very good at. Maybe you should tell all the teams that use it to great success in that role that they’re doing it wrong.
10.3 SPAAs have missiles that go half as fast as the Starstreak and take multiple times as long to get to speed (booster burn time HVM: 0.58 s, booster burn time of your usual SAM: 2.5-5 s). That means you can just push most SPAAs and kill them before their SAM is halfway to you. Against the Pantsir that’s a much closer call, so you have to prefire to play it safe.
Then you’re very bad at using it. Can’t blame the vehicle for that.
They’re excellent to 3rd party people (which happens a lot in squadronbattles), or to murder people that are trying to gun you down. Would be nice to see them buffed, doesn’t mean they’re not already excellent right now.
Once again, vehicles are entities that are getting balanced, not weaponry.
Again, I do not see why this justifies paper weapons being added ot the soviets when they already have the best SPAA.
Su-34 with 6x KH-29 would still be more than what most could actually handle.
If that was a trial, then it was a pretty shitty one as it was heavily limited.
gaijin all ima say mate xD
That’s cheap. I assumed that “It totally blows the competition away” refers to the entire package, just like it makes a massive difference if you launch AGM-65Ds from an A-10A late or an F-16C. If you were refering to the weapon in isolation, my bad, I didn’t expect anyone to make an argument that bad. It very obviously is the best IIR AGM currently in game, no one would argue otherwise.
Again, I do not see why this justifies paper weapons being added ot the soviets when they already have the best SPAA.
Best at being a non-threat, just like all other AAs.
Su-34 with 6x KH-29 would still be more than what most could actually handle.
29TDs are bad for top tier on their own and when you strap them onto a terrible airframe like SU-34 it just isn’t enough. Having 6 of them doesn’t help either.
Best at being a non-threat, just like all other AAs.
Can we stop playing word games. You calling it a non-threat just like other AA is at worst a lie and at best, being disingenuous. The Pantisr is the best AA at countering Arial threats. The sole reason being that it has the best situational awareness, highest missile count, and can track multiple targets allowing for quick reaction time from one target to another.
No other spaa has this capability. There’s a reason why you will never see long range agm launches from aircraft when Pantsirs are present and if you do, you don’t have to worry about them.
29TDs are bad for top tier
Would the Kh-59 (IR variant) be a good replacement for the Kh-38MT? It’s a much less OP agm that being it’s subsonic, has gps and IOG. It’ll be relatively similar to the Hammer.
is the best IIR AGM currently in game
It is the best agm regardless of platform. You can put the Kh-38 on a biplane and it’ll still perform good because the Kh-38 does all the heavy lifting for you.
You cannot say the same for the Mavericks as you’ve already mentioned. Even on the best platform, it still performs poorly because of it’s terrible flight performance.
they definitely are
not
And your proof of argument is? Because they clearly do.
They balance vehicles as a whole
Me when I lie.
Brimstone is right in front of your eyes. Tornado got it first and I don’t think tornado is such an OP plane that Brimstones just needed that nerf.
Clearly from what perspective? Do you know how promise based economics work in case of highly corrupt governments? Or unreformed soviet based militaries? When I say that everything ru delivers is >50% a lie - I mean it.
So that’s what you’re going to base it on? ok
They now have full AGM spawn costs which means its actually the only Heli that cannot spawn in with its A2A missiles for free.
Thank god.
Isn’t the turret ring correct? America hasnt had to fight anyone that wasn’t 30 years behind them at least since like the 60’s, probably not a lot of pressure to fix that, and tanks irl dont brawl inside 500m constantly or have mouse aim, so it might not even be that huge of an issue.
I dont know, they seem convinced htere is an “issue” but I dont actually really know what that issue is
Isn’t the turret ring correct?
Not even close.
The ring sits too high, when it should be nested, creating more of a volumetric hell, while being flat thick enough to defeat auto cannons.
Nor is the armor layout.
they conned 5 second reload
Still slower than reality
You have any better basis?
Here’s some outlets. Mind you - some of them are known propaganda circulators. Which makes situation a magnitude worse.
They’re still producing these pods apparently so.
Don’t need to say much else.
with TGP and F&F AGMs
huh I dont remember this, I assume you mean the Jaguar which wasnt AGMs it was 2 LGBs our first plane with TGP and AGMs was the harrier which as far as I know wasnt the first plane in game with a TGP and AGM
gonna be honest just isnt worth talking to the clear russian mains, they have no reason to change their mind because if they did they might see that they are playing on easy