On yt and X are thermal targeting clips from russian choppers. Does it even look like Gen 1?
A classic is the AGAVA tank sight from the 90’ties (i think). Ingame they’re gen1 quality, but irl screens look like…dunno you just see a huge white blip you can’t even identify. You just see that there’s a thermal source, impossible to identify.
Or,.on the grounds the typhoon carries less spear3s than the F15 can crry gbu39s and no FnF weapon of any kind. Just add GPS only spear3s now and then give them sal as well when they add gbu53s
only if they give GBU-39B Laser SDB, on the grounds that SPEAR 3 is jet powered and a miniature cruise missile
even then GBU-53 is main US counterpart to the SPEAR 3. trying to justify a weapons system nearly 20 years newer as a counterpart is disingenous
Then only if they give brimstone 1s FnF because the F15 has agm65s
the fact that america is fine for cas and we are asking for just a GPS guided bomb similar to that of the SDB for the typhoon and automatically the US needs a new weapon is like bruh
Agava and the thermals on the M1 (original) are closer to gen 0.5 IRL than they are gen 1.
those are practically museum pieces compared to brimstones. Though tbh I have no issue with MMW being added as long as it isn’t only for 1 vehicle
It is literally a miniature cruise missile. It’s a powered weapon with much better time to target than any glide bomb
It’s in a different class from SDB 1
Of course actual counterparts would have to come, unless you want Kh-38MT situation again
Id rather they wait and redo the radar codebase first. Imagine the TKing when the sidelobe illumination mechanic erroneously kicks in.
They could redo radar and release MMW at the same time ideally
One requires the other and iirc gaijin eluded to that in the GR4 dev blog when talking about artificial and natural interference etc. Its also why you dont see me pushing for the ARH A2G munitions for the USSR.
Fair point
(They have since removed it from their website)
Given Russia’s push for import substitution and the T220s development by a state-owned corporation, it’s likely designed to maximize Russian made components. So I wouldn’t say Russia isn’t capable of making them because they definitely are, of the second and third generation as well.
that still doesnt justified the logic of putting such gen 3 thermal on a explodable-disposable battery tho
and 25x zoom?
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Stop going into politics.
Whether russia can or cannot make thermals isn’t in doubt. The quality of those thermals is very much in doubt but its irrelevant about whether the kh-38MT exists or not
You’re telling people to do the impossible.
Funnily enough, Kh-38MT expendable missile, has better thermals than China’s most recent targeting pod (which are usually a lot more capable than missile seekers).
And it’s no secret that China is ahead of Russia when it comes to electronics and imaging sensors etc.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/jcs7i9GyoNPf
Not at all. The rules are very clear.
There are many comments in here I’d love to rip into, but that would be getting political.
It’s really not difficult.