Have anyone done the same amount of work with su-27 videos as this dude? If yes - I apologize and accept your point. But I really doubt that.
It’s not a double standards matter, as I pointed out earlier it’s more a deal of undefined standards. And that’s really annoying. I’m not knowledgable enough with F-16AJ situation so I’ll be quiet about that.
whats wrong with learning another language?
SquishFace If I remember correctly.
This plane doesn’t even exist.
Nothing in particullar is wrong with that. If it’s for fun and your own education - nothing should stop you and nothing indeed does. However - if you have a defined purpose, a goal. It highly depends on which one it is.
Yea, I’ve heard about that, just don’t know how deep the rabbit hole is. Is it worse than yak-141?
Gaijin modeled the F-16AJ how they imagined Japan would use a F-16a if they ever bought them
The F-16AJ represents the proposed introduction of a Japanese F-16A closely resembling a YF-16 into JASDF service, as proposed by General Dynamics in their corporation brochure and advertisement during exhibition in Japan by the 1980s. The JASDF had plans to select a winner from 13 candidates proposed by different aircraft companies as part of a program to replace its ageing fleet of F-104Js and to serve alongside their F-4EJ aircraft. Ultimately, the program came down to a choice between the F-14, F-15, and F-16 where the F-15 emerged as the victor,
the yak141 had flying prototypes f-16aj was what was proposed to japan
they might as well add the Eurofighter-2000J as japan has been considering buying the EF
suuuure.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/6dKurgoa95XA
Edit : below is additionnal evidence that Rafale is missing STR performance, using 3 different sources.
stop coping.
Don’t be so agressive man. Maybe he just overlooked it or heard about it from others. It was highly emphasized that the report was based on a video. Even I didn’t know about additional sources.
Nothing agressive here.
This “aggressive” dude doesn’t even understand the meaning of the word “official” document. He’s talking about brochures for the Rafale. And even the developers said that they configured the Rafale based on the video
Imagine if the most overpowered AGM in the game that has been ruining top tier ground for the past 2+ years actually never existed.
That’s the key word.
Since the brochure for the AJ showed it having dorsal Aim-7s which Gajin decided against so it’s a fictional interpretation of a fictional plane
Alpha Strike was only a year ago
the whole argument of this thread is that a brochure isnt enough proof smh
Not just in the brochure
But after all it’s a completely fictional plane that shouldn’t have been added or removed when the Thai air tree came
the m41a1 had its turret traverse nerfed from a source that said m41 had slow turret traverse but this was addressed in the a1 model
It could just be classified… and they don’t want info leaking…
But if we want to go down the “rabbit hole of fake things”
There’s alot of fake USA tanks either with 1 prototype existing or none at all.
Japan has totally made up vehicles, France, etc.
This post sounds like another “I died to Russian CAS, therefore Russian Bias!” Which is a common post for anything Russian, why? Because people think Gaijin is truly in favor or Russia being OP.
Having played the USA tree, Russian, German, Italian, French, and so on, USA, GER, and Sweden are by far the best nations.
They all were dropping mass quantities of bombs and the like for awhile.
This KH-38Mt wasn’t a problem on the Su-25SM3 because it was easily killed. But now when people need only a little bit of skill to kill an aircraft they break down on the forums how things are imaginary because they can’t find data for it… I don’t live in China, so I doubt I’d be able to find up to date data on new weapons or vehicles… like cmon.
Mi-28A for Sweden will go bye bye too, as they were only tested, not bought.
Same logic can apply to literally the entire object series of tanks if you wanna go that far, if you took the time to actually read the thread rather than “its anti russian” as you always do you would see all evidence in either case is being considered
