It’s obvious BIAS and this thread is proof of this.
1 Like
Are you a native speaker or did you learn?
What would you suggest to someone attempting to learn (me lol)?
It came to me in a dream ✓
5 Likes
And there has been evidence posted that the missile does exist, tho full production may not have been determined
Stop being disingenuous. The only evidence is a mockup, with zero evidence of it ever being tested or produced beyond the mockup.
By gaijins own standards, the weapon should be removed from the game.
17 Likes
Just don’t
Offtopic.
Let’s not forget about others. I remember the developer changed Rafale’s FM using a video. When you need documents to change the flanker’s flight model. There are many double standards in the game, don’t forget about it.
Don’t try to wash it out. That video was traced frame by frame with data analysis provided. However sad it is - I doubt anyone would argue about it being used as a source.
With Kh-38MT however - we don’t even have any evidence that a fully assembled model exists, let alone works.
3 Likes
And? It’s still a double standard. When you have to use official documents to change a flight model, and videos for another flight model.
Reminds me of the story about the F-16AJ.
Don’t forget that you are playing a game with double standards.
@Smin1080p_WT so question, did this even already reach the devs and are they aware that the current gambreaking missle might not even exist?
Or do they have sources that they exist beyond a mock up and have actively been fired?
5 Likes
The fox and scimitar were nerfed on a literally “I feel the turret traverse is too fast” report, so the rules mean nothing.
6 Likes
Have anyone done the same amount of work with su-27 videos as this dude? If yes - I apologize and accept your point. But I really doubt that.
It’s not a double standards matter, as I pointed out earlier it’s more a deal of undefined standards. And that’s really annoying. I’m not knowledgable enough with F-16AJ situation so I’ll be quiet about that.
whats wrong with learning another language?
1 Like
SquishFace If I remember correctly.
This plane doesn’t even exist.
Nothing in particullar is wrong with that. If it’s for fun and your own education - nothing should stop you and nothing indeed does. However - if you have a defined purpose, a goal. It highly depends on which one it is.
Yea, I’ve heard about that, just don’t know how deep the rabbit hole is. Is it worse than yak-141?
Gaijin modeled the F-16AJ how they imagined Japan would use a F-16a if they ever bought them
The F-16AJ represents the proposed introduction of a Japanese F-16A closely resembling a YF-16 into JASDF service, as proposed by General Dynamics in their corporation brochure and advertisement during exhibition in Japan by the 1980s. The JASDF had plans to select a winner from 13 candidates proposed by different aircraft companies as part of a program to replace its ageing fleet of F-104Js and to serve alongside their F-4EJ aircraft. Ultimately, the program came down to a choice between the F-14, F-15, and F-16 where the F-15 emerged as the victor,
5 Likes
the yak141 had flying prototypes f-16aj was what was proposed to japan
they might as well add the Eurofighter-2000J as japan has been considering buying the EF
1 Like
suuuure.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/6dKurgoa95XA
Edit : below is additionnal evidence that Rafale is missing STR performance, using 3 different sources.
stop coping.
3 Likes
Don’t be so agressive man. Maybe he just overlooked it or heard about it from others. It was highly emphasized that the report was based on a video. Even I didn’t know about additional sources.
Nothing agressive here.
1 Like