Ah OK
1 Like
Problem with that is that it’s a generic mock up and not of any specific real APS system we know of, there is basically no information about how it would have worked if it was built.
1 Like
Imma blame US, Russia and china insted. Thank you.
4 Likes
I’ll take the brimstone equipped challenger 2. The missile exists, the tank exists therefore we can get it. 😎
Make them work like spikes ingame - job done.
This APS had smokes inside, and would smoke in the direction of laser.
It later evolved into LEDS 150
Well that’s pretty lame. The Puma has the exact same thing.
Yep, when it existed Mongoose as not yet a thing.
almost 6000 posts in 26 days and still nothing has been proven since the start of the topic, lol
devs are waiting until Russia actually builds the Kh-38MT 
17 Likes
If you have credible sources try to bug report it, i know they already rejected the aps but maybe we can at least get a fixed smoke launcher because other vehicles in game have lwr activated smoke that just work like normal smoke launchers.
Sadly, no. But once I do get my hands on it it will be the first thing I do.
It was actually carrying a brigade of competent engineers and a box of 3rd gen thermals, so they could get there and make a working unit themselves, photograph it and then flee. Possibly a bag of magic dust is also involved, perhaps a priest as well.
You didn’t understand the point they made at all. If 22G is the overload in the maneuvering plane a rolling airframe missile can obviously not achieve that for any relevant time. Their post on it even had nice pictures and graphs to explain it.
There is plenty of evidence to suggest 22g is sustained pull and additional sources since reinforce that fact. Gaijin turned around and said “Igla can’t do this so we don’t understand how the stinger could possibly do this”
4 Likes
You claimed that it should still be able to pull 22G “even if Gaijins reasoning is right”, which is objectively wrong.
There are no good sources that unequivocally state that 22G is the sustained pull and Gaijin only used the comparison with the Igla to justify which line of interpretation they’re going with. Maybe they would be more inclined to enter conversations with the community if people at least had the decency to not twist their words.
1 Like
reminds me of how gaijin said they dont think the brimstone can pull 40 degrees of AoA because the fins are to small (its not the fins that generate the AoA)
At which point the only way to interrupt those sources any differently is if it’s the peek pull. But that is still set to only 13G in game.
So no matter which way you spin it. Gaijin artificially nerfed the stinger because Igla isn’t as good.
And more sources since seem to prove the higher sustained pull with a bug report more than a year old accepted covering the matter
3 Likes
Yeah… probably because Vikhrs can’t do it
1 Like
yeah but igla has the wrong g pull anyway?
igla is 20g rn and stinger is 13g
how can igla pull 20g when stinger cant go 22g and they dont even understand how stinger work?
What?
Did you even read their dev post on it? No, that’s not what they did, or said. They had to decide if the overload data is the average overload or the overload in the maneuvering plane. They used the comparison with the Igla to justify which of those two options they went for.
The Igla is at 10g, or did I miss something?