I would be enclined to say that’s because the SU25 is premium, and removing them could cause issues
At least that’s the reasoning they gave for not adding a leclerc premium next patch
That being said, they could just remove it from SU30 and 34 only if that’s the core issue, and, let’s face it : the SU25SM would still be very capable with KH 38 ML only
As if that’s important when you can just stay outside of range of everything that isn’t Pansir/CAP aircraft lmao.
There’s more than enough videos on youtube of people doing that with 38MLs on the Su-25SM3, and you’re acting as if that’s something that simply “isn’t possible”.
well compare it to the MT and it is imposable why would they risk it lmao (even if the ML is one of the best laser guided weapons in the game that can go from 20km to target in about 17 seconds)
every graph I have seen has shown being able to do that, I assume its because its being launched from a mach 1 jet not at 657 km/h, at the end of the day it is still faster then mavs are at the same range
I was gonna test it with the AGM-65E but it appears its max range is only 10km
Ahh yes, so handheld that they had to get a missile from 2015 to compete; so handheld that gaijin waited until they added the ufo eurocanards, in order to make the flankers flight performance even slightly competitive…
So handheld that they had one of the worst radars up until the release of the Su34.
So handheld that the Mig29 got artificially nerfed due to the cries of us mains, complaining about the R27ER during 100m multipath (the nerf didn’t even fix that, actually they nerfed the flight performance which had nothing to do with the ER).
The us is arguably the most handheld nation in air, they got excellent vehicles at every br, and some are even op…
and the UK had to get a challenger 2 that isnt even in service yet? (still isnt there best tank btw) also that sounds more like an issue with russian equipment then an issue with the US being hand held
and yet here we are russia being the only nation with PESA radars and 2 of them at that
got any actual evidence of that or is this a “my thing got nerfed it had to be US mains” kinda deal?
which is understandable because during the time of SARH missiles it was the strongest BVR missile in the game. Just like how people complain about the AMRAAM and MICA now because they are the best BVR weapons in the game
never claimed they weren’t, just stated that russia was also hand held and people didnt like to admit it.
What you can do is launch within 10km, and then slowly drag the laser point towards the target. This of course not result in a very optimal flight path.
You probably don’t need to test it anyway, it’s very often not going to reach 20km if you don’t launch from high speed and altitude, it’s close to its max range. Even if you launch from mach 1 though, you can still get some suprisngly short ranges. Recently found at you can’t do 12km launches from 1km altitude at mach 1, it will fall short by ~300-500m, even more if the target is moving. Was a bit disappointed with that.
Lucky you, every 11.7 match ive played since the BR changes im drowned in mavs from F16s and F15s man.
Its ancedotal experience I suppose.
every single top tier game ive played (before the BR changes, And even after) has at least one rafale in it, normally its two.
WDYM its a rare occurance xD