I think it’d be the easiest and honestly, the least painful solution to just accept the fact fakes are something Gaijin does from time to time.
Not like the community cares all that much about fictional vehicles.
Something that’s gamebreaking like the MT either needs to be removed or nerfed just like any other thing, but here we see the double standards, AGM65Ds were so good that it got nerfed days after it got added, but in the case of the MT gaijin didn’t touch it at all, infact they fixed its thermals.
1 Like
Shame I wasn’t around when you brought up the issue of Gaijin denying vehicles because there’s no sufficient evidence, while they have total fakes driving around to this day.
Exactly nowhere.
The forum mods here have been extremely kind, what has been deleted besides pure S posts?
If gaijin or the janitors here are colluding to bury the topic they are doing a very poor job.
And people expecting gaijin to immedietely respond to this are pretty much insane. Some people seem to have russia deragement syndrome here.
8 Likes
so developers do theirs and the community does theirs, they probably forgot whose boat they are riding on, no money from us, no payouts
Fake in what sense? The F-16AJ is practically just yet another franken-plane, but based off FSD airframe #2, which was demonstrated to a contingent of Japanese Airforce delegates. Though they did not fly any particular F-16 on that trip. So it’s not all that much worse than the Swedish AH-64 / Mi-28 or Yak-141, not that I actually want any of the listed vehicles to remain in game.
The only issue of any significance is that the Sparrows aren’t mounted to the Landing gear bay doors, but for mechanical purposes there is little difference between it and the actually implemented vehicle in game, it wouldn’t be that hard either to simply rename it as, either a Thai, or forward deployed expeditionary US F-16A and make the minor corrections needed to bring it into line with a specific configuration, that isn’t the -AJ proposal.
Fake in Gaijin standards, same as Ho-Ri production.
1 Like
What are you on about.
Stay on topic.
1 Like
Shame I wasn’t around when you brought up the issue of Gaijin denying vehicles because there’s no sufficient evidence, while they have total fakes driving around to this day.
I can’t be everywhere, so don’t start with that.
I’ve already said I’l support you in asking for the AJ’s removal. If the thread ever gets made…
Exactly nowhere.
You don’t know if you don’t try, but you’ve yet to try. From here, it looks awfully like you’re arguing in bad faith.
1 Like
This rudeness is misguided, forum mods arent devs and they are doing good job keeping this thread clean.
2 Likes
Stay on topic
2 Likes
It’s not to that level, as all items that is has were demonstrated on an F-16A, it’s not like it’s got the AIM-95 and a HMS as well.
It’s closer to the fact that;
- The F-14A is modeled as a Block -130, not a -90 / -95 as it implied to be by being held to the " '77 SAC".
- The F-4E has inconstant features from Blocks 43~67
- The F-16C-50 has features from the Block -50+
- A-10A is an A-10A+ missing it’s TGP and TISL station, on top of a lot of ordnance.
- A-7’s ALR-45 LANA is a TGP instead of a navigation pod slewed by the A2G radar for some reason.
- F-111A has a late variant Cockpit modeled but early configuration 3D model.
- F-15A’s got magical Countermeasures dispensers.
- The F-5E / F-20 even existing, let alone the fact that their FM is based on 3rd party Russian sources instead of Available primary sources that were provided and rejected for unknown reasons.
I could go on, but you get the point.
1 Like
I honestly do know where the topic could go. At this point it is pretty cut and dry the MT was not mounted on any of these aircraft. Let alone have a 3rd gen thermal with 25x zoom.
Only further this discussion could go is one of the CMs weighing in with Gaijin’s stance on the missile.
2 Likes
We are here to make sure everyone plays nice that’s all not here to carry on the debate about the KH-38 if the topic dies off because there is nothing else to add that’s the way the cookie crumbles I am afraid.
Until then you will have your work cut out for you. I will watch with my popcorn. I can already see the topic is making it’s way to pinging CMs left and right.
5 Likes
There always gonna be off topic, KH-38MT I can tell all of you that so how about mod or dev ignore it and give the us the prove about KH-38MT existence hm? because it what people here really looking for. If can’t do that just say can’t and fix the mistake how hard can it be?
It’s not down to us to prove or disprove anything and also debate the topic not the users so loss the part where you’re attacking the users.
3 Likes
I’m just telling you the truth why this topic gonna always go off topic and will continue so
nobody can stop it as long what i’ve said keep happening (and which said group of people are the main reason why this goes off topic)
Unless dev or any mods can proved it existence of KH-38MT “clearly” then everything will stop.
I think I’ve been noticing a trend in the type of people defending the Kh-38MT’s existence…
They’ve always been the type to disrupt, antagonize, and derail.
Besides the lack of evidence that this AGM exists, the reaction from these individuals is by far the most supportive evidence that the AGM doesn’t exist. Repeatedly arguing in bad faith to disrupt the process of trying to uncover whether this missile is real or not isn’t doing anything to help whatever cause you think you’re helping.
17 Likes