The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

This weapon isn’t a precedent to anything.
You have more than one fake Japanese vehicle present in the game and they are still denying things left and right for lack of evidence.

People had ample time to call them out on this, but Gaijin is still doing whatever they want.

1 Like

This has been explained to you time and time and time and time again.

This weapon isn’t a precedent to anything.

Yes, it is.

You have more than one fake Japanese vehicle present in the game and they are still denying things left and right for lack of evidence.

Again, make a post about it if you care so much.

Why won’t you make the post? Could it be because you don’t actually care about it and are just trying to derail the thread yet again?

9 Likes

As this a forum “a meeting or medium where ideas and views on a particular issue can be exchanged.” such as this topic its a place to talk and engage in conversation with other users not to demand things from the devs if you have a Suggestion that can be clearly written and backed with reliable information please feel free to go through the proper channels on that part of the forum.
I have stated before and I will state again we have no more access to the dev’s than you do.
The amount of comments in a topic is irrelevant.

TLDR version: Stay on topic

7 Likes

Threads have been made and lead to nothing, dying a day later after 20 posts.

You seem to care about stuff being rejected from the game due to lack of evidence, all the while fake stuff are roaming around freely.
I’m in awe you haven’t called them out on this years ago, as it’s clear you had grounds to do so.

This one would lead to something, hopefully smin can react but otherwise MT should be deleted.

I’m glad you’re in awe of my integrity.

Make your thread. We will see where it goes.

why would they address this mess of a thread in the first place, every 5 replies its from offtopic to another.

i wouldnt dare read through all that even if someone paid me to do it.

I think it’d be the easiest and honestly, the least painful solution to just accept the fact fakes are something Gaijin does from time to time.
Not like the community cares all that much about fictional vehicles.

Something that’s gamebreaking like the MT either needs to be removed or nerfed just like any other thing, but here we see the double standards, AGM65Ds were so good that it got nerfed days after it got added, but in the case of the MT gaijin didn’t touch it at all, infact they fixed its thermals.

Shame I wasn’t around when you brought up the issue of Gaijin denying vehicles because there’s no sufficient evidence, while they have total fakes driving around to this day.

Exactly nowhere.

The forum mods here have been extremely kind, what has been deleted besides pure S posts?

If gaijin or the janitors here are colluding to bury the topic they are doing a very poor job.

And people expecting gaijin to immedietely respond to this are pretty much insane. Some people seem to have russia deragement syndrome here.

8 Likes

so developers do theirs and the community does theirs, they probably forgot whose boat they are riding on, no money from us, no payouts

Fake in what sense? The F-16AJ is practically just yet another franken-plane, but based off FSD airframe #2, which was demonstrated to a contingent of Japanese Airforce delegates. Though they did not fly any particular F-16 on that trip. So it’s not all that much worse than the Swedish AH-64 / Mi-28 or Yak-141, not that I actually want any of the listed vehicles to remain in game.

The only issue of any significance is that the Sparrows aren’t mounted to the Landing gear bay doors, but for mechanical purposes there is little difference between it and the actually implemented vehicle in game, it wouldn’t be that hard either to simply rename it as, either a Thai, or forward deployed expeditionary US F-16A and make the minor corrections needed to bring it into line with a specific configuration, that isn’t the -AJ proposal.

Fake in Gaijin standards, same as Ho-Ri production.

1 Like

What are you on about.
Stay on topic.

1 Like

Shame I wasn’t around when you brought up the issue of Gaijin denying vehicles because there’s no sufficient evidence, while they have total fakes driving around to this day.

I can’t be everywhere, so don’t start with that.

I’ve already said I’l support you in asking for the AJ’s removal. If the thread ever gets made…

Exactly nowhere.

You don’t know if you don’t try, but you’ve yet to try. From here, it looks awfully like you’re arguing in bad faith.

1 Like

This rudeness is misguided, forum mods arent devs and they are doing good job keeping this thread clean.

2 Likes

Stay on topic

2 Likes

It’s not to that level, as all items that is has were demonstrated on an F-16A, it’s not like it’s got the AIM-95 and a HMS as well.
It’s closer to the fact that;

  • The F-14A is modeled as a Block -130, not a -90 / -95 as it implied to be by being held to the " '77 SAC".
  • The F-4E has inconstant features from Blocks 43~67
  • The F-16C-50 has features from the Block -50+
  • A-10A is an A-10A+ missing it’s TGP and TISL station, on top of a lot of ordnance.
  • A-7’s ALR-45 LANA is a TGP instead of a navigation pod slewed by the A2G radar for some reason.
  • F-111A has a late variant Cockpit modeled but early configuration 3D model.
  • F-15A’s got magical Countermeasures dispensers.
  • The F-5E / F-20 even existing, let alone the fact that their FM is based on 3rd party Russian sources instead of Available primary sources that were provided and rejected for unknown reasons.

I could go on, but you get the point.

1 Like

I honestly do know where the topic could go. At this point it is pretty cut and dry the MT was not mounted on any of these aircraft. Let alone have a 3rd gen thermal with 25x zoom.

Only further this discussion could go is one of the CMs weighing in with Gaijin’s stance on the missile.

2 Likes