Working so well that people are actively contributing ~400 messages a day to this topic.
It’s not about getting a result even. It’s about spreading the idea and making more people demand answers. You see, the only way of getting a message across is to get to a critical mass of discontent.
And the only way to achieve a critical mass - is advertisement. Which you’re being an active part of, thank you for that.
2 Likes
Eh, I just spawn and fly low. Because enemy CAP will also try to hit me otherwise.
So in terms of the platforms, it’s not invincible, especially since those launching their KH-38s don’t really pay attention for some reason…
I wouldn’t expect any company to put all that info publicly. No matter the nation. But I figured asking wouldn’t hurt.
If you look at other brand new weapons such as Spear-3 there is enough publicly available information direct from the manufacturer on at least some of its capabilities to know it will have multiple guidance types in one (so far GPS, IOG, MMW and SAL have been confirmed with IR speculated but not confirmed)
KH-38 only seems to be advertised with singular seekers that can be swapped, but evidence suggests the IR seeker never went past being advertised during the early stages of development, which is the issue
6 Likes
4000 posts in the topic and devs still dont bother to state something
it’s obvious they don’t care…
This weapon isn’t a precedent to anything.
You have more than one fake Japanese vehicle present in the game and they are still denying things left and right for lack of evidence.
People had ample time to call them out on this, but Gaijin is still doing whatever they want.
1 Like
This has been explained to you time and time and time and time again.
This weapon isn’t a precedent to anything.
Yes, it is.
You have more than one fake Japanese vehicle present in the game and they are still denying things left and right for lack of evidence.
Again, make a post about it if you care so much.
Why won’t you make the post? Could it be because you don’t actually care about it and are just trying to derail the thread yet again?
10 Likes
As this a forum “a meeting or medium where ideas and views on a particular issue can be exchanged.” such as this topic its a place to talk and engage in conversation with other users not to demand things from the devs if you have a Suggestion that can be clearly written and backed with reliable information please feel free to go through the proper channels on that part of the forum.
I have stated before and I will state again we have no more access to the dev’s than you do.
The amount of comments in a topic is irrelevant.
TLDR version: Stay on topic
7 Likes
Threads have been made and lead to nothing, dying a day later after 20 posts.
You seem to care about stuff being rejected from the game due to lack of evidence, all the while fake stuff are roaming around freely.
I’m in awe you haven’t called them out on this years ago, as it’s clear you had grounds to do so.
This one would lead to something, hopefully smin can react but otherwise MT should be deleted.
I’m glad you’re in awe of my integrity.
Make your thread. We will see where it goes.
why would they address this mess of a thread in the first place, every 5 replies its from offtopic to another.
i wouldnt dare read through all that even if someone paid me to do it.
I think it’d be the easiest and honestly, the least painful solution to just accept the fact fakes are something Gaijin does from time to time.
Not like the community cares all that much about fictional vehicles.
Something that’s gamebreaking like the MT either needs to be removed or nerfed just like any other thing, but here we see the double standards, AGM65Ds were so good that it got nerfed days after it got added, but in the case of the MT gaijin didn’t touch it at all, infact they fixed its thermals.
1 Like
Shame I wasn’t around when you brought up the issue of Gaijin denying vehicles because there’s no sufficient evidence, while they have total fakes driving around to this day.
Exactly nowhere.
The forum mods here have been extremely kind, what has been deleted besides pure S posts?
If gaijin or the janitors here are colluding to bury the topic they are doing a very poor job.
And people expecting gaijin to immedietely respond to this are pretty much insane. Some people seem to have russia deragement syndrome here.
8 Likes
so developers do theirs and the community does theirs, they probably forgot whose boat they are riding on, no money from us, no payouts
Fake in what sense? The F-16AJ is practically just yet another franken-plane, but based off FSD airframe #2, which was demonstrated to a contingent of Japanese Airforce delegates. Though they did not fly any particular F-16 on that trip. So it’s not all that much worse than the Swedish AH-64 / Mi-28 or Yak-141, not that I actually want any of the listed vehicles to remain in game.
The only issue of any significance is that the Sparrows aren’t mounted to the Landing gear bay doors, but for mechanical purposes there is little difference between it and the actually implemented vehicle in game, it wouldn’t be that hard either to simply rename it as, either a Thai, or forward deployed expeditionary US F-16A and make the minor corrections needed to bring it into line with a specific configuration, that isn’t the -AJ proposal.
Fake in Gaijin standards, same as Ho-Ri production.
1 Like
What are you on about.
Stay on topic.
1 Like