Hmm but China still don’t have IR AGM and stuck with TV KH-29
But for some reasons Russia need MT so bad?
Sweden still stuck with maximum of 4 mav G along with Japan
German IR FnF jet is F4F ICE which can only two of them.
If you pop back up over the horizon at a rather close 4 km the SPAA having moved 50 m perfectly perpendicular to the flight path of your missile makes for an adjustment of the targeting point by .7° from your PoV. That’s nothing.
Do you play squadronbattles? The described strategy is the way you deal with good Pantsir players there, and it works very reliably.
They didn’t.
And if no evidence shows up it should probably be removed because of that. It’s of no consequence to the argument we had about the viability of implementing the Brimstone in steps.
You still don’t understand that one piece of weaponry isn’t all that’s about a vehicle in it’s balancing and BR.
That’s like complaining other nations need full stabilization earlier because UK tanks have it as well.
Or complaining about other nations not receiving M829A1 equivalent at 10.0, but Sabra somehow do.
I guess asymmetrical balancing is hard to get around.
What if it doesnt move perfectly perpendicular to the flight path? Thats factor outside of attacking plane control and thus relies on luck rather than skill.
Sorry, i dont. I cant be bothered with any sort of squadron activity since i moved to WT from WoT 8 years ago.
Because it was a joke? There never was an IR Brimstone, not even proposed. In game it’d prolly just be the current Brimstone with a C&P Maverick-G seeker