The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

A couple seconds is not an “extremely narrow window”, especially in top tier.

The targeting point does not reset when breaking line of sight. It will still be on or very close to the target.

There’s no hoping involved there unless you ignore the time to impact counter.

Youe whole strat is boned if the SPAA moves 50m in any horizontal direction during the time you are below the horizont.

they already had one so there was no need is what your saying?

as far as everyone knows there were NO IR variants

Hmm but China still don’t have IR AGM and stuck with TV KH-29
But for some reasons Russia need MT so bad?
Sweden still stuck with maximum of 4 mav G along with Japan
German IR FnF jet is F4F ICE which can only two of them.

Pretty sure China has some similar ones to Kh-38MT being added as some point if datamines are anything to go by.

Except KH-29.

But if the soviets can get a fake IR seeker for the KH-38 then let’s add IR seekers to the Brimstone

4 Likes

tbf kh-29 isnt ir but tv

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

2 Likes

If you pop back up over the horizon at a rather close 4 km the SPAA having moved 50 m perfectly perpendicular to the flight path of your missile makes for an adjustment of the targeting point by .7° from your PoV. That’s nothing.
Do you play squadronbattles? The described strategy is the way you deal with good Pantsir players there, and it works very reliably.

They didn’t.

And if no evidence shows up it should probably be removed because of that. It’s of no consequence to the argument we had about the viability of implementing the Brimstone in steps.

What does the IR brimstone even look like?

It fake just like KH-38MT

Would have been good enough still with a tpod

At least there’s a mock-up of the Kh-38MT 💀
It was a genuine question though, what does it look like

Ground attack ASRAAMs then.

hey there has been test firing of IR brimstones just super classified and we cant show you just like KH-38MT :)

6 Likes

He meant to give Brimstones and IR like seeker in game… since MMW guidance is not modelled in game yet.

1 Like

Nobody is going to answer the question? Only getting defensive responses, alright.

You still don’t understand that one piece of weaponry isn’t all that’s about a vehicle in it’s balancing and BR.
That’s like complaining other nations need full stabilization earlier because UK tanks have it as well.
Or complaining about other nations not receiving M829A1 equivalent at 10.0, but Sabra somehow do.

I guess asymmetrical balancing is hard to get around.

Thats insanely close for a top tier jet.

What if it doesnt move perfectly perpendicular to the flight path? Thats factor outside of attacking plane control and thus relies on luck rather than skill.

Sorry, i dont. I cant be bothered with any sort of squadron activity since i moved to WT from WoT 8 years ago.

Because it was a joke? There never was an IR Brimstone, not even proposed. In game it’d prolly just be the current Brimstone with a C&P Maverick-G seeker

1 Like