Because it highlights how potent the weapon is if it can dish out so much damage in such a low amount of time spent relative to how long the aircraft has been in the air which has been the case for all 38MT slingers ever since their addition to WT? That should’ve been obvious. But again, I never stated that’s the sole or only reason why it’s OP, you brought that up.
That was half of your post and all the reasoning you gave for calling the KH-38MT OP.
Or maybe you’re arguing about something you have no context for? Considering that post was aimed at how Motorola keeps on claiming MTs aren’t OP because “it’s only an opinion”.
That’s true for all F&F AGMs, especially when you’re running unopposed, as is often the case.
Most other AGMs can actually be engaged by SPAA (by some, that is), are much slower, have shorter ranges, yada yada. The scale is not the same.
If everything is OP nothing is. You might want to complain about the state of top tier CAS instead.
There’s “good enough” and there’s “OP”. Ordnance wise only two A2G weapons currently fit into the latter, AASM and Kh-38MT, everything else is simply good enough.
then do explain to me why the EFT have zero FnF ordinance? its not like they dont have options, SPEAR 3 is right there (and due to gaijin not clarifying the variant we can get it) and its far more real then the KH-38MT
You just said that the amount of kills you can get per time determines how OP something is for the second time.
You didn’t reply to or reference anyone. If you want your post to be seen in context it should probably have context instead of being randomly dumped into a thread with 4200 replies.
Most other AGMs are fired from a plane that doesn’t handle like a bag of bricks.
It doesn’t matter to a tank what kind of missile it gets atomized by. The main problem with top tier CAS is planes with enough ordnance to wipe half the enemy team being allowed to run unopposed unless CAP camps the airspawn. Some CAS weaponry being slightly more idiot proof doesn’t change much about that.
I searched through thousands of pages and the truth is there is NO PROOF of existence of this AGM, and if there is then its confidential.
It was never exposed anywhere, only in technical brochures
which means it shouldnt be added to the game because on paper you can say anything.
It still has Kh-38MLs which outrange any and all NATO SPAA’s, it just would no longer be able to hug the ground after 15 seconds post-spawn (i.e average time it takes for an MT spammer to fire off their Kh’s).
Older vids show that MLs are also more than enough honestly, cus they’re fast enough that they usually take out whatever’s on the ground before the jet even gets in range of non-Pantsir SPAAs.
Well, yeah, it’s kinda funny if you deny you said something just to repeat it a second later.
Why are you posting here if you don’t want replies? I replied to the latest post that had very thin and bad reasoning, just happened to be yours. It’s also not a “whataboutism” to show you that the exact same reasoning you used to call the KH-38MT can be applied to pretty much any other top tier F&F AGM. If you want to call it OP at least use decent arguments, it’s not like those are in short supply.
Because I played the Su-25SM3 in ARB. Less than a quarter of my games in that thing were in GRB. I spaded the Rafale in GRB, however.
I mean if its good enough for the KH-38MT lol but in all seriousness it would be nice to have an SDB counterpart on the EFTs to help counter pantsirs combined with GPS/SAL guidance I think they would probably replace Brimstones
NOTHING can stop a kh38mt carrier from firing its agms before it dies, you would have to literally circle their airspawn to be able to kill the carrier within 5 seconds
the people trying to defend this thing will look at that and just go “but I cant just launch all 4 immediately and dive to the ground where im untouchable??”