Basically. Closest equivalent would be vikhrs on Su-39s.
Its a damn shame too, ive been waiting for decent top tier multirole jet for my ground rb german lineup for ages and this is it.
Id go as far as to say that F-4F late beats EFT as the most effective CAS for contested airspaces, because at the very least F-4F late has mavericks.
And unlike KWS, it has variant with usable zoom.
why dont you link the website?
Waifu pillows are halal, confirmed by gaijin itself.
Its not gonna be too long before AI is to the point where its indistinguishable from anything real and I can only imagine these forums and other places then.
For past documented events it moght not be to bad, but anything contemparary is gonna be a nightmare. Even the video gens are getting there.
Proceeds to add totally fake vehicles.
it was 2 years ago and was for a nation that had no options at the time and once again people have asked for it to be removed, the addition of the F-16AJ is completely different to the addition of the KH-38MT
NGL it’s kinda the same in gaijin not doing any research. Not only is the F-16AJ nothing like the real proposal, japan very well could’ve actually just gotten the XF-2A, contrary to what gaijin said, it would’ve very much been acceptable to add at the time as a sidegrade to the F-16C, if they actually researched it they’d know that.
Repost? It was the image I posted but photoshopped with a IR seeker. I can post the image when such instances come, and it did, aside from that, no.
I won’t talk about this further as it has been already disclosed.
F-16AJ is easier to model than XF-2A probably
they always go the easy way
And the addition of the F-16AJ is wrong. The XF-2A would have fulfilled the same role, at the same BR; and would even be a real plane on top of that!
Its not diffirent st all it didnt exist, we should of got a n f2 or or so not a false jet
If this is photo shopped ngl it’s a pretty good photo shop
IR missiles still can be locked from far away rather than MMW seekers which have limited range
modern arh missiles are only able to acquire targets from 10km (fox3)
these mmw waves requires more power and have much more limited battery in the missiles. hence they have limited range
but that still just one picture and doesn’t show what aircraft even carry
Other example is Brimstone test fire by Apache we have full video display it even Brimstone never use by apache
The “No” vote is also there for me due to no option “Let’s wait for confirmed information before deciding.”
Cause that’s my stance at the end of the day, all I want is confirmed information one way or the other.
The only stake I have here is air sim EC convoys.
At this point i only see prove of MT as fake missile more than it existence.
Ty, also it Shows either innert or mockup of the KH38MT i still don’t think it’s really much consistant proof in My opinion it’s like eurosatory tanks being mockups, or not functional like the Kf-51 u “crewless turret” it’s just a non functional turret, a good way of checking is finding patents, but like i said before unless the missile can be seen actively working it can be taken either as mockup or non functional at the moment
