still no proof?
1 Like
Except that one which I made xD
1 Like
One potential mock up and nothing more.
If it can be proven that it was ever constructed then it could probably remain in game by Gaijin standards
damn
No I saw it I am good thank you. But you did a good job with it. You can send it to UniqueScorpion though so they can see what is being talked about.
1 Like
It’s a new day and the same whataboutisms are being posted in here. Still no evidence of the seekers actual development more at 11.
The amount of kills per time (in an individual match) is what determines if something is OP? Here’s five in two seconds.
Spoiler
I never said that. My point is that Kh-38MTs are effortless to use and will yield you kills quickly and without using your brain (right after spawning too, meaning very little “contact time” compared to most other A2G weapons).
You also don’t need to whataboutism this, AASM is another weapon that is grossly OP, but at least it might be nerfed “into the ground” considering recent data on what its seeker can and cannot do.
Thanks. :)
Why stress the x kills in x seconds part if it’s irrelevant? That was half of your post and all the reasoning you gave for calling the KH-38MT OP.
That’s true for all F&F AGMs, especially when you’re running unopposed, as is often the case.
If everything is OP nothing is. You might want to complain about the state of top tier CAS instead.
Because it highlights how potent the weapon is if it can dish out so much damage in such a low amount of time spent relative to how long the aircraft has been in the air which has been the case for all 38MT slingers ever since their addition to WT? That should’ve been obvious. But again, I never stated that’s the sole or only reason why it’s OP, you brought that up.
That was half of your post and all the reasoning you gave for calling the KH-38MT OP.
Or maybe you’re arguing about something you have no context for? Considering that post was aimed at how Motorola keeps on claiming MTs aren’t OP because “it’s only an opinion”.
That’s true for all F&F AGMs, especially when you’re running unopposed, as is often the case.
Most other AGMs can actually be engaged by SPAA (by some, that is), are much slower, have shorter ranges, yada yada. The scale is not the same.
If everything is OP nothing is. You might want to complain about the state of top tier CAS instead.
There’s “good enough” and there’s “OP”. Ordnance wise only two A2G weapons currently fit into the latter, AASM and Kh-38MT, everything else is simply good enough.
1 Like
then do explain to me why the EFT have zero FnF ordinance? its not like they dont have options, SPEAR 3 is right there (and due to gaijin not clarifying the variant we can get it) and its far more real then the KH-38MT
2 Likes
@Jεcka its wild me and you are agreeing on stuff considering how much we have argued in the past lmao
Enemy of my enemy is my friend, lol.
2 Likes
You just said that the amount of kills you can get per time determines how OP something is for the second time.
You didn’t reply to or reference anyone. If you want your post to be seen in context it should probably have context instead of being randomly dumped into a thread with 4200 replies.
Most other AGMs are fired from a plane that doesn’t handle like a bag of bricks.
It doesn’t matter to a tank what kind of missile it gets atomized by. The main problem with top tier CAS is planes with enough ordnance to wipe half the enemy team being allowed to run unopposed unless CAP camps the airspawn. Some CAS weaponry being slightly more idiot proof doesn’t change much about that.
SPEAR 3 has the same problem as Brimstone. Gaijin clearly won’t had MMW seekers yet.
1 Like
there is an IR version I would also take them as GPS/SAL since then they would be better Paveway 4s with a longer range
1 Like
There is no reliable evidence for that. It seems some people mistook “imaging” seeker to mean “IIR” when it likely meant radar imaging.
2 Likes
I searched through thousands of pages and the truth is there is NO PROOF of existence of this AGM, and if there is then its confidential.
It was never exposed anywhere, only in technical brochures
which means it shouldnt be added to the game because on paper you can say anything.
If the SM3 lost it, it would be in all regards a worse Su-39