Well I’ll be.
yeah like you said it gets advertised before they begin production so i dont think its being produced in mass rn and at most its probably limited testing
have a meme about it (this isnt just about tanks but CAS in general lol)
8 Likes
To gain funding for development. It’s quite common for weapons manufacturers to do so. IRIS-T & Meteor were offered for sale well before they were ever functional. There’s also the Typhoon ATGM (not the plane) based on the asraam, of which mockups existed, but that never went anywhere
2 Likes
lol not even. Better thermal range and target acquisition etc, makes it easier in modern day
1 Like
what? I mean ive seen videos of air launched missiles taking out tanks in a certain place we cant talk about
He proposed some sort of “FnF only” Brimstone that can’t exist. He’s not the only one of course, that demand is ever present. There’s a disconnect between wanting something removed because it might not exist and wanting something added that can’t possibly function in that form.
It flies to the designated target and locks on to it once it is in range. I’d presume that in order to do so it searches within some sort of defined area and then goes for the signal that best matches what it’s intended to hit, but that’s just guessing. That’s different from the behaviour of IIR/TV guided AGMs as currently implemented in game. Those will switch from POINT to TRACK when something moves through their rather narrow FoV. Granted, I don’t know if that behaviour is realistic for IIR/TV AGMs either, but their lock range is artificially cut down in the first place, so no one would be launching in POINT mode if their implementation was more realistic in the first place.
I fail to see the point you’re trying to make? Many munitions don’t have all their capabilities in game. Spike, PARS 3 LR, AGM-62 ER, AGM-130 and probably some others are all missing their datalink/LOAL capability for example.
Many planes get down (or sometimes upgraded) weaponry they never used for balancing purposes. I’d assume that the Brimstone integration on the Typhoon is backwards compatible anyways.
From over certain borders
1 Like
Evidence of a single test fire would be enough to close this thread but so far none have been provided
6 Likes
This is untrue
Let’s not forget about the Patriot, S-300/400, BUK and many others. Also, let’s not forget about enemy aviation
AH-64 behind F-14 is criminal lol. And no AH-1 :(
1 Like
There are many vehicles (aircrafts, tanks, etc) as well as munitions (shells, missiles, etc) that are offered in various configurations by a wide variety of manufacturers for purchase however that doesn’t mean that they are operationally used (or that they even exist in the first place outside of design documentation)
Can you show it in a private chat?
Cruise missiles, AARGM, SDB series, AIM-120, Meteor
1 Like
Not even a single picture lol
6 Likes
yeah, at least T-14 can be proved but KH 38 MT cant be proved rn cuz of the lack of any consistant proof appart from words, its like other weapons when it began being tested it was just drawings and words, something that a lot of people tought it would be a lie, could end up as a similar case or end up different, this type of stuff with such claimed capacities really need consistant proof other than words, cuz there isnt even data on the sensor for the missile
1 Like
It’s the Russian Bias in the room with us right now?
the fact there are also are no buccs when they were instrumental to the success of the tornado
1 Like
ive also seen storm shadows fly right past pantsirs and S-300s that couldnt even track them lol
2 Likes