You tried to bring nations into this while I was clearly talking about cons of specific vehicles.
You wrote a whole wall of non-information for nothing in hopes to dodge my question.
12.7 f14 has 9H rear aspect 18g missile vs all aspect r60m 30g
13.0 f14 has 9L 30g no irccm vs r73 50g with irccm
Have you considered that there are modes (that aren’t custom battles, I’ll go get screenshots from the mod page if you doubt me) where stats are not recorded, anyway how exactly is this at all actually relevant to anything that was put forward, very little that was put forward was subjective.
I feel arcade has actual options and is strictly less of a TDM, and significantly less op ahyper-fighter biased modes in comparison ARB thus more evenly balanced. Air Conquest is actually far closer in feel to RB-EC with the fact that it’s not got respawns disabled means that teams don’t fold instantly sometimes. Sure its a shame with the limited round timer. but you can get around that pretty easily.
Nowhere is it actually specified that any one particular mode is relevant to the topic at hand. I can fairly easily point to a multitude metrics and reports to back my arguments, could you say the same?
Such as? those that the “Su-x” might face as a contemporary and reside in the US tree?
That’s not what was asked. Again say it with me now.
Where do the advantages lie for other nations?
None of the previously specified US airframes have that much of an edge in either A2A or A2G respects, outside the narrow Static AI Target set, which is not what the KH-38’s advantages lie. also it’s not even relevant in some modes since they lack static AI targets, entirely.
Guys, fill me in.
It’s still as fake as it was before, am I right?
Basically; non-specific, showroom-floor tier notional Mockups probably did exist for the Thermal seeker. But it falls well short of requisite of a prototype. Let alone a flight tested item, or it otherwise mounted to any aircraft. As is precedent for most other additions.
@Pacifica these people keep going offtopic on the post continously
nothing new has been sent here
Such was already deemed to be true a good 1500 posts ago as well, with a majority of the recent posts just people strawmanning about the missile or trying to make arguments via other equipment to justify a unrealized piece of equipment being added.
Nothing has changed since the post started.
yup
b-b-b-but russian top tier air needs them or there wont be a reason to play them!!!
/s
surely
It boggles the mind that Gaijin a) failed so utterly in adding the thing in the first place and b) failed to act and made it worse in the time since it was introduced.
B R U H
U were so surprised that one dude dont know any cons of su34 and su25 yet when i asked u what are the cons u say this lmao. Jeez… lemme rephrase it for u yet again.
What are the cons? (Not in ur opinion)
Scroll above and you’ll find it, not like they aren’t obvious.
What? A strike fighter cant doghfight? What a shocker. So what are the cons again?
maybe on the russian forums. this whole thread is prime proof of seethe with the primary reason that it favours russia.
The amount of planes that have been hammered down with FM nerfs and uptiers just 'cause american players couldn’t fight them
me when the thread still hasnt shown that the missile is real and is just people saying “because X was OP for Y time Z should be allowed to be OP” because reparations or cope or something
Can people actually discuss that there is only maybe a handful of photos and all only of a mockup dummy. nothing further at all nor any remainants of a MT found in places of combat you would anticipate it to have made a debut in.
they still gonna find a way to disregard ur question and go back to “itz riel vro yu US coping lmao”
If you plan to use it to find targets from 30km away that thermal optic will need to be cooled or it will lose it’s sensitivity.
Thermals is another thing that Russia are yet again behind on compared to the West. Especially Germany IRL the Pumas thermals are incredible