The Kh-38MT may not actually exist

mmW or IR+IOG it still FnF yet one allows to have FnF because they using IR while other not allow to have FnF because they use different seeker?

consider western SPAA is jet sure that better missile can compensates what they luck ground SPAA just fine sure you have pantsir for defense ground against incoming AGM and bomb because west don’t bother have with SPAA like that but west using jet with better missile
and actually, they do have good SPAA that on par if not better than Pantsir IRIS-T SLM for example.

But it does not dominate. CAS has been dominant way before the introduction of the Kh-38

IRIS-T is not a Pantsir equivalent, it’s a Buk equivalent.

Also as I said before. You still technically beat IR with smoke, mmW does not

and now its even more dominant and more on the side that actually has competence spaa

your thread name was very good imo

2 Likes

unless we know they really used the same technology we cant nerf a completely different missile on the basis of another, Russia stole the tech from the aim9b to create the r3s
but still manged to create much better r60 and r73 missiles later

Wait I must have been tired when I first saw this. But it says the 65mt is an On-board computing platform not a seeker.

The seeker inside does appear to be the same so possibly both are 305M seekers and it’s just a change of the nose cone?

3038 posts and absolutely ZERO concrete proof that the missile known as KH-38MT is actually real

2 Likes

Its impossible to achieve 3rd gen IR imaging without significant cooling.

You must sacrifice refresh rate, resolution or “colour” bandwidth significantly.

Edit:

As an FYI, pretty much all thermal imaging sensors are cooled in some way or another, even off the shelf civilian use ones which use TEC cooling, which any proposed sensor on the KH-38MT would have to use.

4 Likes

i believe kh38mt could be real but mostly classified irl.

however thats not the point, theres not enough proof for it to be in game and should be removed and replaced.

my opinion is to replace it with kh29td and buff its seeker with IR and zoom and quality as i believe its just a agm65b seeker.

also give some tgb on su34.

if gaijin has proof and shows us (highly unlikely) they can keep it in game, but otherwise, what i proposed could be a good idea.

10 Likes

Appreciate the input and suggestion provide o7

1 Like

Sorry, tgb? I don’t know that acronym

What makes you so sure it’s 3rd generation?

Thermal imager of the T-90M tank does not require cooling

gaijin model it gen 3 ingame and they quote “it was incorrect” in the datamine

You know its funny when bigfoot has more photographic proof of its existence than KH-38MT

45 Likes

that’s gotta be the funniest thing i seen all day

Yes, the maus, with a fully built hull and turret and all its internals are enough to be in game. It doesnt matter that the remaining one in a museum is two prototypes stuck together, its still a tank which existed.

he means tgp

wont happen because it dosent have IR irl
if they wanted to make up IR missiles they would give the EF IR Brimstones

1 Like

Ah…

Thank you