Sorry, tgb? I don’t know that acronym
What makes you so sure it’s 3rd generation?
Thermal imager of the T-90M tank does not require cooling
gaijin model it gen 3 ingame and they quote “it was incorrect” in the datamine
that’s gotta be the funniest thing i seen all day
Yes, the maus, with a fully built hull and turret and all its internals are enough to be in game. It doesnt matter that the remaining one in a museum is two prototypes stuck together, its still a tank which existed.
he means tgp
wont happen because it dosent have IR irl
if they wanted to make up IR missiles they would give the EF IR Brimstones
1 Like
Ah…
Thank you
lmao
imagine how much russian mains would complain if it ended up with the ir camera from an agm65d
it does, but due to its larger size and not particularly high resolution it doesnt need the same kind of active cooling system as many ir missile seekers
can you provide photographic evidence of you going outside(aka outdoors, not in a building)
If there is no actual proof of the KH38MT existing then it should either be removed or gaijin should open the doors for other nations to get proposed armaments.
I personally am fine with the KH38MT staying, but I am not fine with the apparent double standard of Russia getting a weapon which may only be a mockup while other nations require extensive proof of their weapons existing for them to be added.
Even when other nations get their weapons added half the time they aren’t accurate to documentation, (im looking at you mr Stinger).
5 Likes
I would have to post the same photo twice.
10 Likes
lmao
Well, they reject even things that the players positively prove with primary sources, saying “our consultant says the source is wrong” etc
Good luck asking them to remove something “because there isn’t enough evidence” …
2 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Progress as of today:
With over 3000 messages we’ve recently passes 1000 votes in favour of it being removed, with 83% of the over 1260 votes being in favour of it’s removal. In the week since it’s initial posting we have found no further evidence of it existing. In fact we’ve found reason to believe some of the initial evidence is out of date, and does not actually support the missile being in service.
11 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.